x

You have decided to merge your account with the GOG.com.

You can now start participating in the community discussions.

x

You chose to opt out from the merge process.
Please note that you will not be able to access your account until you opt in.

We strongly encourage you to merge your RED account with the GOG.com one.
If you want to do it later please try logging in again.

  • Register

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cyberpunk 2077 Teaser Trailer

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Suhiira View Post
    That and psyberpsychosis is the excuse CP2013 used to limit the amount of cyberware you could have ... much the same way Shadowrun uses Essence.

    Is it necessarily the "best" or "reasonable" or "logical" reason for it to be in the game in the first place... not really. But in any game some things exist for the sake of game balance.
    Oh, I dunno. Little doubt that's part of it, but the budget for me was always a better gate - and so much harder to get around. Humanity loss is handleable in multiple methods, especially after Eurosource came out.

    Whereas money, that only the GM controls and is -easily- stolen or forced out on expenses? That's a piece of cake.
    All posts are typically and brilliantly my own, unless you see my Moderator Voice. | We have Rules! Read 'em! | Visit the Forlorn Hope!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sardukhar View Post
      Whereas money, that only the GM controls and is -easily- stolen or forced out on expenses? That's a piece of cake.
      True, but you and I have both seen (to) many instances where money quickly becomes a non-issue. So some other limiting factor money CAN'T buy is useful.
      "When you talk you are only repeating what you already know. But if you listen you may learn something new." - Dalai Lama

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Suhiira View Post

        True, but you and I have both seen (to) many instances where money quickly becomes a non-issue. So some other limiting factor money CAN'T buy is useful.
        Never where I'm running a game. Well, not since I was 16. If the PCs earn the money, great. And as soon as money becomes a non issue, so does Humanity loss.
        All posts are typically and brilliantly my own, unless you see my Moderator Voice. | We have Rules! Read 'em! | Visit the Forlorn Hope!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sardukhar View Post

          Oh, I dunno. Little doubt that's part of it, but the budget for me was always a better gate - and so much harder to get around. Humanity loss is handleable in multiple methods, especially after Eurosource came out.

          Whereas money, that only the GM controls and is -easily- stolen or forced out on expenses? That's a piece of cake.
          Its worth pointing out too that there are some Shadowrun games (and now Canon in Shadowrun: HK) that imply that certain individuals can chrome up without suffering ill effects from essence loss due to being somewhere further down the sociopathic spectrum. They aren't full on asocial psychopathic and definitely not kill crazy mindless, but they aren't exactly emotionally complex people either.

          In practice it's pretty hard for a PC to pull off that kind of character though, considering how emotionally charged games can get, so take that for what you will.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Corewolf View Post

            Its worth pointing out too that there are some Shadowrun games (and now Canon in Shadowrun: HK) that imply that certain individuals can chrome up.. kill crazy mindless, but they aren't exactly emotionally complex people either..
            CYBERZOMBIE!!!

            Err..carry on. Nothing to see here. Lovely trailer, wannit?

            All posts are typically and brilliantly my own, unless you see my Moderator Voice. | We have Rules! Read 'em! | Visit the Forlorn Hope!

            Comment


            • I doubt we'll have to wait til 2020. Most probably it will be published next year, maybe towards the end. UNLESS they are stuck with some insourmountable mechanical problems they find difficulty in solving and the issues cant be ditched -like not having flying cars in the game, if they want them in the game, or IDK, customizable/2 gender characters, or smthg as major as this-, I cant imagine the development process lasting more than 5 years...

              Only the super major studios (like Sony) can afford doing that (and sometimes they did it, sucessfully, with The Last Guardian, for example). But the large sums of money CDPRED is still making with Witcher 3 wont last forever, and the studio has now between 350-500 people working in the baby... Thats a lot of dollars.

              In a recent Polish interview, Michał Kiciński, co-founder of CDP hinted -actually it wasnt him, but other guy who made the remarks) that the time from actually announcing the launch date and the launching per se could well be less than a year, with the caviat that huge sums of money should be invested in publicity, in a relatively "short" period of time. Of course, this should not be taken as anyhing more than rumours, but maybe they are going for a different economic model of development/advertising.
              Last edited by Jack_in_the-Green; 17-03-17, 14:29.

              Comment


              • Next year would be a shorter development time then their previous games though... and with CP2077 going to be much larger then even Witcher 3, and them not having done a sci-fi game befor, and it being a compleatly new setting from what they are used to making, and a lot of the other things they have talked about the game which is fairly new to even inovative, etc, I have a hard time thinking that they would churn out this game about a year or so earlier then they did Witcher 3.

                And I am certain that they will do what ever it takes to make sure that CP2077 comes out right the first time as well, so even if they maybe internally are looking at a 2018 release I would not be surpriced if they would not have any problems what so ever in increasing the development with a year or even more if they felt that was what would be needed to get to a point where they would feel comfortable with releasing it.

                The Witcher 3 was after all delays twice, for something like 6-9 months in total after all. And that second 3 month delay from February 2015, to May 2015, they did even though they had promised that W3 would NOT be delayed a second time. So yeah... if they feel that CP2077 needs more time, they WILL take more time. And if they intend to pull a Fallout 4, then we might never actually get to hear anything at all about any kind of delay.
                Last edited by Calistarius; 17-03-17, 16:04.

                Comment


                • Too much cool ahh I want this game now >.<

                  Comment


                  • I am anxiously awaiting Cyberpunk 2077 as well, but I can't imagine the game releasing any time prior to late 2018, at the earliest. Perhaps something will be gleaned during E3 next month, which is scheduled for June 13-15. However, a thorough search of the E3 website shows that CDPR is Not scheduled to attend, nor are any of their games listed, so the best we can hope for is being pleasantly surprised I’m afraid. I do know that the grant CDPR received from the Polish Government came with a deadline date of June 2019 (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news...-New-Game-2019). However, I'm sure if they needed to extend the date at least once, they can do so without incurring any penalties. I'd rather wait and have the game be the best that it can be anyways, which I believe is the foreseeable prognosis. CDPR is the best and they have my utmost confidence, they have never let me down; yes they delayed the Witcher 3: Wild Hunt twice, but look how amazing it is. I was also blown away by the little thank you note that came with the Witcher 3, they didn't have to do that, but it shows how much they genuinely care about their customers. Regarding the grant funding and the four conditions awarded the money, which converts to roughly $7 million in USD are: seamless multiplayer, cinematic feel, animation excellence and city creation. If this doesn’t have you even more pumped for the game then I don’t know what to tell you. Myself, I'm a little skeptical about the seamless multiplayer, but I am not a fan of multiplayer in general, so I hope it’s an option and not fulltime. Of the four grant topics, I am personally most excited to see what evolves out of the City Creation funding. This game is likely going to be a legitimate reason to invest in a 4k television, the graphics are going to be that good.

                    Comment


                    • I predict that this will be the first game in which I will be helplessly lost in the city... It will be GLORIOUS

                      Comment


                      • I mean i do beleive that we will have this game in 2018. Maybe later in 2018 if delayed. Theyve been working on this game for a long time. Yes they have never done sci fi before but i dont think the genre of game is going to inpact the dev time. They said that witcher 3 being there first open world game that they learned alot that cyberpunk 2077 would benefit from. Also theyve had a small separate team working on this since 2013 laying all the groundwork for the advanced devolopment. But what really interests me is the teaser trailer esp the part that says the games release date is 2015. Kinda odd considering the witcher released in 2015 and that they actually announced cyberpunk 2077 first. I think this game was originally going to be done using the redengine3 and then they realized that what they wanted to accomplish with this game required an upgraded engine...and so the red engine4 was created to carry the load of a more technically demanding game. Thus the delay. But i think well def be playing this game next year. My prediction is that well start hearing about it in oct-nov and the game released in may 2018. Just like witcher and right before e3 2018.
                        "The early bird gets the worm, but the 2nd mouse gets the cheese"

                        Comment


                        • Dum vita est, spes est.
                          'Sorry, but smashing barrels is one of my hobbies!'

                          Forewarned is forearmed. Therefore, to reduce chances of random encounters with the Guards, please, review the Rules and Regulations of the Forums. Thank you.

                          Comment


                          • Nothing wrong with hope...and i hope im right hahahs
                            "The early bird gets the worm, but the 2nd mouse gets the cheese"

                            Comment


                            • And theres 1 more thing i wanted to share to add to the hope. I think its a general consensus that the hidden message in the teaser trailer def said 2015. Now i know they said that its more like when its ready...but the just the fact that they were even considering 2015 as a possible release date at the very least hints that they were working on this game alot more than people think back then. LOL sorry i think about this alot. It has literally become an obsession. If i could come up with an algorithm to find out a definate release window i would. Just watched blade runner and its got my f*ckin hyped as $hit.
                              "The early bird gets the worm, but the 2nd mouse gets the cheese"

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DarthRaver8686 View Post
                                But what really interests me is the teaser trailer esp the part that says the games release date is 2015.
                                Last I checked... it says
                                Coming..........When it's ready.

                                Who's to say there's some hidden code at all?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X