Ignoring the de-rail about scrolling and consoles for a moment...
The OP is spot on, EVERYONE looks at the gold cards first so why not have them immediately visible on the left? Alternatively the view could start on the right-hand side.
The OP is spot on, EVERYONE looks at the gold cards first so why not have them immediately visible on the left? Alternatively the view could start on the right-hand side.
I'm pretty sure that anyone who knows mulligan ban rules looks at bronze and silvers first. I used to check golds first too, though.stridecolossus;n7567640 said:
NlelithZ44;n7567780 said:
Considering all CA generators and most deck thinners are silver and gold, i have to disagree. For example, while playing Skellige the first thing i want to know is how many cards i will be able to discard using my golds and silvers, and then redraw based on that.
+1 to the OP and i also find weird the fact that your cards are sorted by strength and rarity in your hand(which can help guessing what they have left and what they just played, when playing an ambush, for example), but they aren't in graveyard, which makes knowing what's left in your deck hard when the graveyard is filled.
4RM3D;n7567170 said:
This. The interface is made to coincide with the Xbox and soon to be, PS4, which is fine like for the console but I'm sure (just having a guess) most PC players sit close to their screens so there wouldn't be a problem with having two rows of five.
Maybe have an alternate card selection screen that decreases the size of the cards and card text slightly. This would be handy for players who know what their cards do already.. I know this isn't a priority with everything going on, I'm just another player that feels the same.
stridecolossus;n7567640 said:
Not necessarily, I find silver's in some decks can be worth more - all a matter of choice obviously but I still think they should just throw all 10 cards in front of your face to make the selection easier - I have a duff mouse so when I scroll down so many times it scrolls up, bloody annoying.
Last edited:
The game is much more playable when you can lay down on bed with a gamepad and you don't need to stare at the monitor from 1 meter. Devs support gamepad, because anyone who can run with it and have the ability to use large display will choose it. Just because those who can do that usually use consoles doesn't mean it's a console interface.
prostynick;n7569240 said:
It's called a console interface because most people who use it, are console users. That doesn't mean it's only meant for them.
PS. Since Steam went to the living room with streaming (boxes) and Steam boxes, they have introduced Big Picture Mode, which has a similar feel to a console interface. Except you can disable it, if you want.