Be careful Lisbeth, you're starting to sound like me 10 years ago. You don't want that rep. 
kofeiiniturpa;n9543441 said:Be careful Lisbeth, you're starting to sound like me 10 years ago. You don't want that rep.
Do we hate each other or do we love each other? I really can't tell.
Lisbeth_Salander;n9543551 said:
It doesn't matter. We are only trying to converse anyway.
I don't plan to keep visiting the same site for 10 years. I rather make my own business or build a family.
Yes, I've seen it. I said it's easy to make, but to play it is a different story. But I'm saying I'm against Cyberpunk 2077 to become turn based. There's no real effort put to make it interesting. Again, I doubt they're aiming for anything turn based. It's a lazy man's way to make games.Suhiira;n9533311 said:
mcflurry928;n9547091 said:
Lisbeth_Salander;n9532531 said:
Yea, I highly doubt they'll go towards turn based shooter. Like you mentioned, it won't sell well to the casuals out there. It's still a pretty niche game genre if you ask me.
I'm also not a big fan of turn based games. I've never been a fan and I never will be one. It reminds of playing chess which is so dull and boring. When there's too much thinking involved, it stales the fun for me. It's just not my style, but I guess some people love that type of stuff.
CDPR should make a SPIN-OFF turned-based tactical Cyberpunk game or a SPIN-OFF real time isometric tactical Cyberpunk game..CDPR you guys need to DIVERSIFY!
walkingdarkly;n9547501 said:CDPR should make a SPIN-OFF turned-based tactical Cyberpunk game or a SPIN-OFF real time isometric tactical Cyberpunk game..CDPR you guys need to DIVERSIFY!
I don't know, if that's not what their interested in or passionate about then maybe it's not a good idea.
I'm thinking of "The Witcher Adventure Game" as I say this.
I'd be down to seeing that sort of thing, for either The Witcher or Cyberpunk, being done by a company that specializes in those sort of games.
NukeTheMoon;n9553271 said:
Nah, they need to diversify, expand their portfolio! Sides, the companies that specialized in these sorts of games that would do both ip's justice no longer exist, they were either destroyed by EA or corporate meddling. RiP BullFrog
Generally against it. I was used to it in some older games like some old 2000-era turn based dystopian game that I cannot remember (one of the character's was called Gennady or so, another was an asian female ninja-like character and the team all had blue uniforms) or, say, KOTOR.
But in modern games with a realistic-looking "alive" world, it kind of takes the flow away from things.
I prefer real-time or "smooth" combat with RPG elements. In the end, preferences differ but that is what I currently prefer.
But in modern games with a realistic-looking "alive" world, it kind of takes the flow away from things.
I prefer real-time or "smooth" combat with RPG elements. In the end, preferences differ but that is what I currently prefer.
if the game is not turn based and its open world 3rd person real time combat its really going after GTA imo which is awesome. rockstar would have to up their game cause for the first time ever they got competition.
animalfather;n9583641 said:
Imagine CP2077 surpassing every aspect of GTA and being a huge success. What's even greateer is if CDPR forces other companies to make their games better.
Lisbeth_Salander;n9584141 said:
Absolutely. I just hope the game is more like GTA and less like Deus Ex, the stealth rumors got me worried a bit.
i always wanted GTA Neo Tokyo and Rockstar was actually doing some pre-production on it before ditching it.
animalfather;n9586001 said:
I wouldn't be worried. Imagine GTA with stealth mechanics, it would be nice.
Turn based would turn me off.
If there's one thing I expect from any game that involves guns is that shooting something must be satisfying. You pull the trigger, the ammo explodes from the chamber and impacts the enemy that gets thrown away. Blood paints the scene. It's loud. And wet. There's a reason Doom's shotgun and chainsaw are always such memorable weapons. Not saying it should play like Doom, I actually like the idea of third person, and cover.
Stealth is ok, if done properly. Sniping is fun. I just hope it's not overpowered as usual. Meaning you can guarantee taking no damage while doing sneak attacks with a 400% multiplier. Stealth in games are almost always way too much reward for literally no risk. To the point it feels that if you aren't using stealth you are playing wrong.
If there's one thing I expect from any game that involves guns is that shooting something must be satisfying. You pull the trigger, the ammo explodes from the chamber and impacts the enemy that gets thrown away. Blood paints the scene. It's loud. And wet. There's a reason Doom's shotgun and chainsaw are always such memorable weapons. Not saying it should play like Doom, I actually like the idea of third person, and cover.
Stealth is ok, if done properly. Sniping is fun. I just hope it's not overpowered as usual. Meaning you can guarantee taking no damage while doing sneak attacks with a 400% multiplier. Stealth in games are almost always way too much reward for literally no risk. To the point it feels that if you aren't using stealth you are playing wrong.
The thing with stealth in such games is the patience/skill to maneuver into position for that "perfect shot".joaopinga;n9587041 said:
Now I'll freely admit the games where stealth acts like some sort of invisibility (i.e. most) aren't very good because of the way the mechanic is implemented. Nor at the ones that have a stealth mechanic that's near useless because the AI has x-ray vision and can see/hear you thru walls.
Lisbeth_Salander;n9584141 said:
That's the day I can die happy. It'd be the best thing to happen to gaming industry. NO stupid microtransactions, NO fillers, NO more half ass storyline and gameplay. Gaming companies could become innovative and creative again. Oh I simply cannot wait for that day to come.