A few times I have given arguments which you haven't countered, only claiming I am wrong, while you remain stubbornly attached to your own opinion like it's the only truth in the world. Let me put it even more clearly, so that there can be no misunderstanding.
The level of a player is not a good indicator of his or her capabilities and it doesn't scale uniformly. The only reliable indicator is the rank of a player. However, because rank resets every season, that value is lost. Maybe CDPR ought to look at the average rank of a player across the (active) seasons, to get better matchmaking in casual. When they implement such a suggestion, then basically 4 kinds of players can be distinguished: beginners (rank <10), casuals (rank 11-17), pros (rank 18-20) and elites (rank 21+). Here, the only goal is to match those kind of players with others of the same group. The level indicator, however, is all over the place. I have seen level 30s having rank 21 and level 100s having rank 15. And once we are a year further every non-beginner is level 60+.
So, going back to the level indicator, and I quote "higher levels and titles mean more (better) cards, experience and better stats". First of all, "better stats"? What does that even mean and how does it affect the game? It doesn't really. Next, having more cards is irrelevant when you already have a competitive deck. To achieve that, you only need 4 gold, 6 silver and 15 bronze cards, which theoretically can be obtained from just milling the starter's decks. The only thing level will tell you is how much time the player has spent playing the game, which is only important for beginners (level < 11). They, at least, should be protected from the rest.
