I thought blacklisting would go a long way to complicate and ruin the ladder, but after playing 10 games against Dagon in a row the other day I changed my mind, it's not that I lose all the time, far from it pretty sure I am in positive, like 55% or so, but it is really boring, like Groundhog Day match of Gwent, all the time. And not to mention surprising amount of Consume and even Eredin. If there was some deck that counters Monsters hard and I mean hard like 90% win rate I would switch to it even if it cost me 6k scraps to get it and lost every other match, but I doubt something like that exists.
When Axeman were all rage, there wasn't nearly as many Axeman decks, even than there was more Dagon by my account.
And Nilfgaard meta, how I miss Nilfgaard meta, there was a ton of Monsters than and even Skellige was widely played. Hell if metas were designated by most widely played and not most powerful and dominant in top tier faction, every meta would be called Monsters meta, something needs to be done about that.
When Axeman were all rage, there wasn't nearly as many Axeman decks, even than there was more Dagon by my account.
And Nilfgaard meta, how I miss Nilfgaard meta, there was a ton of Monsters than and even Skellige was widely played. Hell if metas were designated by most widely played and not most powerful and dominant in top tier faction, every meta would be called Monsters meta, something needs to be done about that.