Siegfried vs Yaevinn: The Talk Down
Spoilers are present and welcome: I may have missed a few things and intend to play the game further though I have now completed The Witcher several times, at least once for each the Order, the Scoia'tael and neutrality.
I have been having a lot of firsts recently with the Witcher games, but the one I'd like to discuss here is the dichotomy present in the responses of Siegfried and Yaevinn after being talked out of conflict with Geralt during the neutral epilogue in the burning Temple Quarter. Apologies that I do not have the exact script. I found it interesting that Yaevinn apparently intends to reform and build instead of destroy, at Geralt's behest. Meanwhile, Siegfried, when told to "fight the real enemy" (anticipating the subject to be the corrupt head of his Order) marches off to redouble his elf-slaying efforts.
It seems that Siegfried is the objectively inferior party. Is it intended that Siegfried be the murderer with the most conviction? I suppose it makes sense given the religious nature of the Order. In Machiavellian terms, one could argue Siegfried's side is stronger for his confidence and Yaevinn's weaker for his fickle beliefs.
Spoilers are present and welcome: I may have missed a few things and intend to play the game further though I have now completed The Witcher several times, at least once for each the Order, the Scoia'tael and neutrality.
I have been having a lot of firsts recently with the Witcher games, but the one I'd like to discuss here is the dichotomy present in the responses of Siegfried and Yaevinn after being talked out of conflict with Geralt during the neutral epilogue in the burning Temple Quarter. Apologies that I do not have the exact script. I found it interesting that Yaevinn apparently intends to reform and build instead of destroy, at Geralt's behest. Meanwhile, Siegfried, when told to "fight the real enemy" (anticipating the subject to be the corrupt head of his Order) marches off to redouble his elf-slaying efforts.
It seems that Siegfried is the objectively inferior party. Is it intended that Siegfried be the murderer with the most conviction? I suppose it makes sense given the religious nature of the Order. In Machiavellian terms, one could argue Siegfried's side is stronger for his confidence and Yaevinn's weaker for his fickle beliefs.