Oh, yeah, for sure, 14 pages and counting of people having issues with the game, MYSELF INCLUDED, must be our rig. I knew someone like your would pop out hahahaI have already written that I have stable 60 fps at 2560x1080 on (almost) maxed settings on i7-10700k & GTX 2070s.
With ray tracing on i get fps drops to 54-57 fps, but very, very rarely, only where there is maxed crowd and a lot of buildings
displayed.
Now I have tested it on my "backup" gaming PC, and, on
8 (!) years old processor:
i5 2550k €4.3 GHz
and
4 years old Nvidia GTX 1080p
I get 60 fps most of the time on mostly medium settings,
with occasional drops do 40+ but only in similar circumstances as stated above.
After some setting tuning I got the game to run at no lower then 50 fps in those "worst" moments and 60 fps >90% of the time.
So, if someone gets lower fps on better hardware, the problem is probably on his side, not game's.
EDIT: Well, OK, there may be some specific hardware / system settings combo that triggers some kind of performance "bottleneck".
I would start from setting everything in driver settings to default, game settings to the lowest possible and then changing in-game settings to higher ONE AT A TIME and observe performance impact/difference.
Yeah and I'm with 9700k, 2080ti on 1440p (2560x1440) can't dream for that kind of performance with settings like yours. Either you're testing it indoors and looking down to the ground, or just plainly lucky as hell or something else...I have already written that I have stable 60 fps at 2560x1080 on (almost) maxed settings on i7-10700k & GTX 2070s.
With ray tracing on i get fps drops to 54-57 fps, but very, very rarely, only where there is maxed crowd and a lot of buildings
displayed.
Now I have tested it on my "backup" gaming PC, and, on
8 (!) years old processor:
i5 2550k €4.3 GHz
and
4 years old Nvidia GTX 1080p
I get 60 fps most of the time on mostly medium settings,
with occasional drops do 40+ but only in similar circumstances as stated above.
After some setting tuning I got the game to run at no lower then 50 fps in those "worst" moments and 60 fps >90% of the time.
So, if someone gets lower fps on better hardware, the problem is probably on his side, not game's.
EDIT: Well, OK, there may be some specific hardware / system settings combo that triggers some kind of performance "bottleneck".
I would start from setting everything in driver settings to default, game settings to the lowest possible and then changing in-game settings to higher ONE AT A TIME and observe performance impact/difference.
I have already written that I have stable 60 fps at 2560x1080 on (almost) maxed settings on i7-10700k & GTX 2070s.
With ray tracing on i get fps drops to 54-57 fps, but very, very rarely, only where there is maxed crowd and a lot of buildings
displayed.
Now I have tested it on my "backup" gaming PC, and, on
8 (!) years old processor:
i5 2550k €4.3 GHz
and
4 years old Nvidia GTX 1080p
I get 60 fps most of the time on mostly medium settings,
with occasional drops do 40+ but only in similar circumstances as stated above.
After some setting tuning I got the game to run at no lower then 50 fps in those "worst" moments and 60 fps >90% of the time.
So, if someone gets lower fps on better hardware, the problem is probably on his side, not game's.
EDIT: Well, OK, there may be some specific hardware / system settings combo that triggers some kind of performance "bottleneck".
I would start from setting everything in driver settings to default, game settings to the lowest possible and then changing in-game settings to higher ONE AT A TIME and observe performance impact/difference.
It's their potato unoptimized game, not your rig. They postponed it for months just to fix the reflection of the sun on the penis.
miracle? Why can't I ask for a normally optimized game? My system meets the minimum system requirements quite well, but I see a lot of errors. As a result, we have a penis enlargement simulator game and, of course, a bunch of mistakes.Yer and thats what you should be getting!
GRAPHICS: GeForce® GTX 1050 Ti with 4GB GDDR5 & RAM: 8GB DDR4-2400 but you expect miracles! OMG
miracle? Why can't I ask for a normally optimized game? My system is quite adequate for the minimum system requirements, but I see a lot of bugs.
Very curious as to people's experiences post patch.
Especially those of us on 1000 series cards.
Unfortunately the specs they recommended were for 30fps but they don't state it on that table. Even when booting up the target fps in settings was 30.
I have a 1080ti and can only do 35fps at 3440x1440 with drops to 20 in action areas.
There were no optimization fixes in this patch just mission and gameplay fixes.
I'm seeing a lot of people claiming a significant performance difference. Perhaps just a placebo effect?