What ever happened to the notion that if you play well with a well constructed deck, you have a chance of winning. It is never a good thing when one deck defeats anything that does not specifically tech against it. Tech is intended to strengthen a deck against its specific weaknesses, not as a necessity to compete against specific opponents.
But you see, we speak more or less the same here: no matter if a deck defeats anything that does not tech against it, or a deck does not need a single tech as it cannot be defeated - is the same story of an overpowered set.
Pretty much this.
that's not the case though is it. You say it is while ignoring every other faction is relying on a single leader or archetype to carry it and more importantly do not have half the consistency. Adding a few strong cards is not the same thing as bringing them to the same level as SK. It's not 1 or 2 cards that makes SK strong it's not even 1 or 2 leaders.
There's nothing T1 about Viy, T2 maybe and that's if you don't know how to play against it. I played against it, won R1 easily...forced them to play Haunt in R2 and Heatwaved Viy at the end of R3. Koschey is not even T2. I've never even encountered anyone using it except me and I'm about to remove it. The trade off in board space isn't worth 2 or 3 larvae for a few turns and even then it barely breaks even with it's provision cost. If you look at individual cards you can always argue your point and make it appear valid but the discussion is about the factions as a whole.
You have overlooked one small but important detail: brokvar hunter can damage any unit, which is a complete gamechanger against boardclogging tactics or even mill to some extend and therefore obviously synergyzes with almost every SK deck, be it self wound, bloodthirst, beast druids etc.
I understand your frustration with anaghad, and I think his adrenaline should probably be 2 or so but there are ways to counter him. one of the answers is the usual ace up everyones sleeve heatwave but you can also just lock arnaghad. People dont like including locks in their decks (except NG) but tbh locks are very strong in this meta with cards like arn, gezras, kolgrim and the list goes on
well kind of but no. without any setup arnaghad is not play and win. you need to setup either damaged units or defender/sukrus, both can be interrupted depending on the opponents deck. but I somewhat agree, it is a lot easier to setup than kolgrim or gezras. I dont think arnaghad is well designed, its just another super binary win condition card and probably shouldnt be 10provision. but just keeping a heatwave/lock in hand can solve the problem easily.
Mind listing all those 'broken' cards there?
Yes, SK synergy is a real topic, I agree. But again, the aim is to bring most factions to the same level - although still a long way to go, but WotW at least made solid steps in that direction without introducing anything gamebreaking.
I was wondering the same. It seems the posts under "community" show in any of the forum depending on how you have filtered..."hot topics" etc. I don't know if that's how it's supposed to work
There were already gamebreaking things from the last expansion, or are we pretending the game was ok before WOTW? NG has perhaps moved back to it's previous position before the double ball nerf which is great but not much has changed beyond that.
And now, a word from a moderator: Ay, the Community section is shared in common between all three Forums. We try to move the most obvious Cyberpunk wanderers to their proper destination.
