Yea they lied a lot lol
Brilliantly done deserves to be seen. Kindly complete the poll if you would like to weigh in.
Sensible choice, I hope they fix the game I just don't know if they will change clear design choices. Bugs for certain.I would probably agree, but I stopped watching after the spoiler warning. I dont plan to start playing until goty with all the expansions comes out and a few hundred mods to boot.
*yawns*
It's funny how easily people get sucked in the marketing hype. If you actually think teasers and pre-release trailers are going to resemble the actual game you must be new to video games.
You people need to realize ever since Fallout 4 these types of games have never been the same.
*yawns*
It's funny how easily people get sucked in the marketing hype. If you actually think teasers and pre-release trailers are going to resemble the actual game you must be new to video games.
You people need to realize ever since Fallout 4 these types of games have never been the same.
I cant understand ONE thing...and, its a critic:
Why i need to agree with a yes or a no or 'i dont know?
Cyberpunk, as a complex game - and it is - has elements that work for some, do not work for others, in third parties, we will concretize and, even so, with different ideas - it happens.
Why, then, is there no such alternative in the 'poll'? because what we propose is and merely 'organized supporters', something like 'if it's not A, it's B ... if it's not B, it's A'.
I, in particular, find this so 'mediocre' ... it is as if, whoever asks the question, tries to impose, by hammering, an opinion on others ...:
'Jhon doesn't like ice cream, so he likes Sandwiche' ... :B
Most people are sheeps that get influenced by some influencer on Youtube to preorder, and later get influenced to hate the game. Even game journalists get influenced, the average score for PC at release date was 92, now that the game is better because of patched the score is lowered to 86.*yawns*
It's funny how easily people get sucked in the marketing hype. If you actually think teasers and pre-release trailers are going to resemble the actual game you must be new to video games.
You people need to realize ever since Fallout 4 these types of games have never been the same.
By now as I assume most people that got it at launch must be through it or at least well into it. I think most would have to agree that the game is not really what they said it would be.
Brilliantly done deserves to be seen. Kindly complete the poll if you would like to weigh in.
Most people are sheeps that get influenced by some influencer on Youtube to preorder, and later get influenced to hate the game. Even game journalists get influenced, the average score for PC at release date was 92, now that the game is better because of patched the score is lowered to 86.
This is not directed at the OP. I did not watch the video because of spoiler warning. If there is constructive feedback in there it is appreciated, it will drive developers to improve the game or do better next time.
Same here. Really makes you wonder how much they changed when they got Keanu on board. I mean nothing definitively says they didn't have the game as it is planned from the start and were just waiting to cast their Silverhand but like they point out with the bit on the radio about Silverhand dying last year, it does seem like they changed direction 2 years ago. If that's true it explains so much.Interesting thought about the last minute rewriting to give Johnny Silverhand space. So maybe without him we could have a RPG, instead a Action Adventure Looter Shooter.
What really knocks me off is that there are so many cutscenes with "your" V in ingame-Footage (Saving the girl, meeting with Dex in the Motel).
And in the game? Nothing.
Let it swing in the inventory, make a few pics and see him/her again in the endings.
That's it.
Cyberpunk is anything but a complex game and that is the problem, it's a shell filled with placeholders there isn't anything complex about it, if there was people wouldn't have complaints.I cant understand ONE thing...and, its a critic:
Why i need to agree with a yes or a no or 'i dont know?
Cyberpunk, as a complex game - and it is - has elements that work for some, do not work for others, in third parties, we will concretize and, even so, with different ideas - it happens.
Why, then, is there no such alternative in the 'poll'? because what we propose is and merely 'organized supporters', something like 'if it's not A, it's B ... if it's not B, it's A'.
I, in particular, find this so 'mediocre' ... it is as if, whoever asks the question, tries to impose, by hammering, an opinion on others ...:
'Jhon doesn't like ice cream, so he likes Sandwiche' ... :B
I think that is the issue, because we as players interested in the game as it is developed can only relate to whatever information the give us. And as you say Silverhand and Keanu weren't especially focused on in the first trailers or information, looking at the character sheet from back then Silverhand is just one among 3 options of a childhood hero. So if that were intended to have been important for the story or character, one can only assume that each option would have more or less equal influence on whatever it would be.Same here. Really makes you wonder how much they changed when they got Keanu on board. I mean nothing definitively says they didn't have the game as it is planned from the start and were just waiting to cast their Silverhand but like they point out with the bit on the radio about Silverhand dying last year, it does seem like they changed direction 2 years ago. If that's true it explains so much.
To be fair if I was an exec of the game studio, not a dev but an exec, and I had an opportunity to get Keanu into my Cyberpunk game, not sure how you'd turn that down.
I think that is the issue, because we as players interested in the game as it is developed can only relate to whatever information the give us. And as you say Silverhand and Keanu weren't especially focused on in the first trailers or information, looking at the character sheet from back then Silverhand is just one among 3 options of a childhood hero. So if that were intended to have been important for the story or character, one can only assume that each option would have more or less equal influence on whatever it would be.
So maybe Keanu got hired and they had to build a story around him and just selected one of the 3 original options to be the role that Keanu should play, which might have resulted in a lot of changes being made to the story and missions etc. don't know. And maybe the other sections in the character sheet and characters weren't relevant anymore, because everything had to focus on him.
At least to me, it seems like that were the case and they probably ended up focusing so much on it, that they never really had time to fix the rest of the game and the idea of choices that should matter etc. never really got implemented. Because its hard to deny that this have been one of the main points that they have been highlighting throughout most of their marketing material up until release.