That ia really nice for you. But just because you're relatively well off doesn't mean $60 is not a considerable ammount for many. In fact you would be surprised to learn how in many countries $60 is a very significant ammount. And we are talking about main story lenght. that is nowhere near to 100 hours.I paid £200 to take me, the misses at the time, her daughter and and my niece to the movies, a movie that lasted 2hours and dinner beforehand.
I've paid, again, hundreds to go to a Zoo
Hundreds on a nightout
Thousands on a 1 sometimes 2 week holiday
Hundreds on a weekend break
God knows how much on a pair of shoes or a jacket
I paid £60 for a game that at minimum, per OP post, gave 20hours of entertainment, subjective just like the movie, dinner, holiday, nightout etc, but realistically gives 100's of hours if enjoyed through replay value, i'd say that was top notch eddies spent
So today after 34 days 26.5% of players completed Cyberpunk 2077, it's same number as Witcher 3, after 5.5 years. For me this is good news, Witcher 3 was really long for some people, so I'm not surprised only 1/4 of all players completed whole main story. Story length data are from HowLongToBeat.com, so it's average, some of you maybe completed those games way faster. It's ok, not everyone is good at playing videogames or rushing main story.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Achievement Passed the Trial (51hrs main story length)
Cyberpunk 2077 - Achievement The World (21hrs main story length)
If you want to compare it to other big games..
Horizon Zero Dawn - Achievement Ended the war machine threat (22hrs main story length)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - Achievement Quite the Adventure (12hrs main story length)
Red Dead Redemption 2 - Achievement Redemption (48hrs main story length)
DOOM Eternal - Achievement The Once and Future Slayer (15hrs main story length)
Assassin's Creed Odyssey - Achievement Odyssey's End (42hrs main story length)
CDPR "warned" us about shorter main story, are you ok with 21hrs or you wanted little bit more? Also those articles on the internet about "Cyberpunk 2077 is losing players very fast" etc are now explained, I guess.
Im actually whats considered poor, staying in what was considered for along time to be one of the worst areas in Britain if not Europe but you're right i do consider myself fortunate, took me a year to save for a xbox one and over a year to have money there for a series X when i can get one, i buy a new game maybe twice a year and im able to do it simply because gaming is what i do nowadays and i'd be lost at worst bored shitless at best without it.That ia really nice for you. But just because you're relatively well off doesn't mean $60 is not a considerable ammount for many. In fact you would be surprised to learn how in many countries $60 is a very significant ammount. And we are talking about main story lenght. that is nowhere near to 100 hours.
Depends on the game and story.What I really don't understand, and please someone do try to enlighten me, people who find 40 hours story too long. Why don't they just take a break half way and finish the game later?
I just don't understand why you would settle for less when you could resonably get more.
What I really don't understand, and please someone do try to enlighten me, people who find 40 hours story too long. Why don't they just take a break half way and finish the game later?
I just don't understand why you would settle for less when you could resonably get more.
I had 170 hours after my first ending. Then I went back for more from last save point before point of no return and to see other endings. Haven't even tried if I can do "Don't Fear the Reaper" yet.Main story length is not the game length. People who blow through it quickly and think they are done are [...]. They did not get their money’s worth. There is far more story in the main character side quest arcs, etc. Galaxy has my game time at 146 hours and I just finished my first ending last night. Will play all endings available.
Did you read it all or just feel offended at the first sentence?Poor people don't spend money on silly outings the way you do. I don't know when you spend money like that on those things but poor people buy necessities to survive and rarely anything else. You have no idea what poor is or means.
So today after 34 days 26.5% of players completed Cyberpunk 2077, it's same number as Witcher 3, after 5.5 years. For me this is good news, Witcher 3 was really long for some people, so I'm not surprised only 1/4 of all players completed whole main story. Story length data are from HowLongToBeat.com, so it's average, some of you maybe completed those games way faster. It's ok, not everyone is good at playing videogames or rushing main story.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Achievement Passed the Trial (51hrs main story length)
Cyberpunk 2077 - Achievement The World (21hrs main story length)
If you want to compare it to other big games..
Horizon Zero Dawn - Achievement Ended the war machine threat (22hrs main story length)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - Achievement Quite the Adventure (12hrs main story length)
Red Dead Redemption 2 - Achievement Redemption (48hrs main story length)
DOOM Eternal - Achievement The Once and Future Slayer (15hrs main story length)
Assassin's Creed Odyssey - Achievement Odyssey's End (42hrs main story length)
CDPR "warned" us about shorter main story, are you ok with 21hrs or you wanted little bit more? Also those articles on the internet about "Cyberpunk 2077 is losing players very fast" etc are now explained, I guess.