I was more or less responding to those statement specifically, I even used a similar numbering scheme in my reply to help with the presentation. I am not sure how you would interpret that response as a response to the last few pages (that seem to be centered around reverse engineering/data discussion) but I will continue to "be so nice" and not dwell on that.Your argument sounds good and logical.
Unfortunately only if you haven't read anything that has been discussed on the last 6-7 pages.
The gamplay mechanics of CP2077 cancel your argument.
I don't feel like explaining this to you, be so nice and read it for yourself.
I am more interested in and speaking to the justification of it all (the why), which was the intention of my response. Please and thank you.
As far as the previous pages go, @Robert_Pelz was one of the few I saw who is plainly articulating the root issue. Most everyone else is just dancing around it.
Cheers Chooms.