I doubt Warriors will run him. He is good, however in that case you would rather just play Hemdall.Skellige and weather. I already detest it.
What benefits from damaging opponents? The stupid warriors of course.
Isn't it wrong to like or detest something until you see it in action?Skellige and weather. I already detest it.
What especially benefits from damaging opponents? The stupid warriors of course. Would be nice to see SK cards with clear ANTIsynergy with that deck.
Why though ? I do not see why the defender would even make him any better.Regarding Fulmar:
Great Rage of the Sea support but you have to make sure to take advantage of his order. Otherwise he is just 6 body + spawning a 4 provision special. So defender protection appears to be crucial
[...]
Why though ? I do not see why the defender would even make him any better.
He is always a well distributed 12 for 12, that triggers Alchemy synergies and the archetype's Scenario.
In that regard Fulmar is similar to the devotion version of Usurper.
The main difference is that Usurper's value is completely proactive (for being an evolving card and being devotion restricted that is pretty much to be expected) and that Usurper has a small engine ability, while Fulmar can immediately generate at least a few points, if the opponent does not answer him immediately (also a 12 for 12 that the opponent "has to answer" is not exactly a joke).
This card fixes the worst problem Druid SK currently has (not having high provision cards to trigger Gedyneith in Round 3).
Fulmar has a 6pt body.Yes, it´s also a huge support for druids, but probably you want to play his order and with 5 body it´s probable that he will be removed/blocked. Of course you can also protect otherwise (e.g. purifier, boost by 2nd scenario card (Mardroeme)).
Rience is much better?I look at Fulmar then I look at Rience. I don't get it.
yup, this is all looking too familiar. I haven't seen anything that will disrupt SK dominance so far. Even when they try not to buff it, it get's a buff. I think the problem lies with their leaders because their cards are just too consistent. Something needs to give, either adjust the leader abilities or several cards need to be nerfed.i am not a fan of these SK cards. I think trying to make weather work is a nice goal, but the only cards that benefit from this directly are Dagur and GS, which im not a fan of. Hopefully the 2 remaning SK cards have synergies with these 2 revealed so far. And Rage of the Sea should get a 1-2 provision buff while Reckless Flurry a -1 provision nerf.
Otherwise SK warriors will still be the dominant SK archetype, because indirect damage is rarely as good as removal.
Just look at indirect damage decks (WH frost, vampires, bloodthirst) compared to removal decks (SK warriors, SY Pirate Cove or Lined Pockets), the former are tier 3 or lower, the latter dominate the meta at tier 1.
Not necessarily as benefiting as the two you mentioned, but I thought this could work well with wild boar and witcher mentor if the damage sticks. Or even a beast deck to also benefit from the spawned sirens.i am not a fan of these SK cards. I think trying to make weather work is a nice goal, but the only cards that benefit from this directly are Dagur and GS, which im not a fan of. Hopefully the 2 remaning SK cards have synergies with these 2 revealed so far. And Rage of the Sea should get a 1-2 provision buff while Reckless Flurry a -1 provision nerf.
Otherwise SK warriors will still be the dominant SK archetype, because indirect damage is rarely as good as removal.
Just look at indirect damage decks (WH frost, vampires, bloodthirst) compared to removal decks (SK warriors, SY Pirate Cove or Lined Pockets), the former are tier 3 or lower, the latter dominate the meta at tier 1.
As far as I am informed Reckless Flurry is not exactly the prefered leader ability for SK Warriors ...[...] And Rage of the Sea should get a 1-2 provision buff while Reckless Flurry a -1 provision nerf.
Otherwise SK warriors will still be the dominant SK archetype, because indirect damage is rarely as good as removal.
[...]