Starting to get a wee bit tiresome after 20 years
(although prison ship sounds more interesting)
For me, Bethesda games have never been about the combat. Ever since Arena, their combat systems have been, shall we say, less than fluid.
Yep. Good-ish combat in RPGs is nice, but historically not a part of the genre and actually really tough to do, since so many people have carying opinion on what that is. I really like 2077 combat a lot - flank, gunfire, melee, accelerate opponents, reinforcements, hacking, nice hit-feel - but many people complain. Of course, many people complain regardless...
People have to choose:mod support or ladder climbing without using cutscene...the engine is not capable of both.
By Azura, by Azura, by Azura!Adoring fan, the return
By the Seven, that's gotta be the most punchable face I ever sawAdoring fan, the return
View attachment 11326724
Starfield Seems to Include a Throwback to an Infamous Elder Scrolls NPC - IGN
A recent Starfield video seems to indicate that one of The Elder Scrolls' most infamous NPCs could get a major reference in the upcoming sci-fi RPG.www.ign.com
Me neither. Skyrim is the last decent game they made IMHO. I feel little joy in playing a blank-slate character in a barren wasteland, which is what all Bethesda games are about.
Just my opinion, but it's a bit surprising. Knowing that unlike Skyrim, in Fallout 4, the main character is not a blank slate, it's even voiced (I think it was saw as a default by some players^^). The map is probably a bit smaller than Skyrim one, but it's also a bit more fill up by stuff to do/explore.
Still nothing compared to what we get from The Witcher and similar games. I'd rate Skyrim higher than Fallout 4, the character still feels like a blank-slate even voiced. For me it doesn't matter if there's much to do if it's pointless. Gimme a good story with good characters and an open world with purpose. In The Witcher 3, it feels like everything is full of meaning, even the smallest things.
