I see Ciri is a very important character then.
she is like her mother, maybe she can end the wild hunt.
About Ciri:
Which mother? Yennefer, her adoptive mum? Yen is nowhere near as powerful as Ciri on a "global" level but of course she is a mighty sorceress. She can turn people to animals and stuff. But the elves from the Wild Hunt are very powerful sorcerers as well (and warriors) so it's very unlikely that Yen would stand a chance against a bunch of them. Ciri's real mom, Pavetta of Cintra, was quite powerful but she couldn't really control her blood based powers like we saw in the scene in which Duny - emperor Emhyr - appeared at the court in Cintra as a bewitched hedgehog-headed person.
Ciri is probably the most important and most powerful person in the witcher world. If anyone can end the Wild Hunt it's her. But she's also very vulnerable and can't stand a fight against a bunch of experienced warriors. She cut herself off from common magical powers so all that is left to her are her witcher fighting skills (which are quite impressive but not unbeatable). She probably cannot end the Wild Hunt or escape from it without help. That's where Geralt, Yen and all the other people we know from the wichter books and world come into the equation...
Ciri is probably the most important and most powerful person in the witcher world. If anyone can end the Wild Hunt it's her. But she's also very vulnerable and can't stand a fight against a bunch of experienced warriors. She cut herself off from common magical powers so all that is left to her are her witcher fighting skills (which are quite impressive but not unbeatable). She probably cannot end the Wild Hunt or escape from it without help. That's where Geralt, Yen and all the other people we know from the wichter books and world come into the equation...
About the end of the books:
it's a somehow closed but also open end. We don't know for sure whether Geralt and Yennefer are dead and stay dead or not. We know that Ciri and the unicorns are very powerful and maybe there is a way to save them. The ritual which happened between Ciri and Ihuarraquax at the end of the books which led to Ciri disappearing with Geralt and Yen on a magical boat indicates that they may survive. But Ciri's reaction in the epilogue when Galahad asked her about them indicates the opposite. Same is true to what Triss thinks about the possibility to see Ciri once again in life. We know at least that Ciri stay disappeared after the events in the book and that she didn't do anything to stop the prophecy. In The Lady of the Lake Nimue talks to Condwiramurs many years after the events in the book about the likely ice age which will happen in about 3000 years because Ciri didn't give birth to a child. (It was also Nimue who helped Ciri to find Stygga castle in the witcher world while Ciri travelled through multiple dimensions.) It seems to be canon in the world of the witcher that neither Geralt, nor Yen nor Ciri were ever to be seen again after the pogrom in Rivia. Maybe the lived on in another dimension on another planet in another time? Who knows? But their apparent death is the culmination of one of the major motives in the novels: "something ends. something begins." Before the pogrom in Rivia happened Geralt came finally to the conclusion that he doesn't want to be a witcher anymore. He had enough of fighting for other people and shallow principles without seeing that the good really prevails in the end. He wanted to concentrate on his personal life, together with Ciri and Yen (which was unlikely alltogether since Ciri already agreed to be the concubine of the heir apparent of Kovir in order to give birth to a child who could prevent the ice age from happening). Geralt's destiny was to be a witcher. Without that he lost his sense of living and taking the sword for one last time was of course bound to only bring death. But then again predetermination - another major motives of the witcher books and novels - is also a double-edged sword. There is no real consensus in the world whether you can't change your destiny or the destiny of the world or if your actions and decisions can influence the outcome of events. Geralt doesn't want to believe in destiny or predetermination although he is conflicted about that. The elves strongly believe in predetermination and so do most of the inhabitants of the witcher world, sorcerers and sorceresses included. Only Philippa noticed at the end of the books that maybe there is hope that predetermination isn't all that condemning alltogether. She gave Ciri the possibility to visit to Rivia to meet Geralt because she finally thought that there are ways to influence destiny and that personal freedom should be maintained up to a certain level.
All this means that several interepreations of the end of the saga are possible. It's an open dialogue and so is the end. It's up to the reader to decide or to feel what happened to them and whether they could be saved or not. Destiny seems to be condemning and Geralt's flame of light was already small and at the end of burning out with another prophecy saying that he would die because of three teeth but there is also hope -even if small- in the world of the witcher. Make your own interpretation.
All this means that several interepreations of the end of the saga are possible. It's an open dialogue and so is the end. It's up to the reader to decide or to feel what happened to them and whether they could be saved or not. Destiny seems to be condemning and Geralt's flame of light was already small and at the end of burning out with another prophecy saying that he would die because of three teeth but there is also hope -even if small- in the world of the witcher. Make your own interpretation.
Last edited: