He did it for Mass Effect 3, Dragon Age II ( which he then was shouted at to change because of a favorable score he gave it and he did make it one of most disappointing games of that year ), Alien: Isolation and so on. It's generally not the entire review that he changes based on that but parts of it.
As for TESO. A lot of people hated that game. Dunno about Reach and ODST but we'll see.
I would personally expect a favorable score from Joe on DA:I
@knightofphoenix: I would argue that being able to acquire gameplay skills does not make one more intelligent and/or capable. After all Alistair and Wynne can acquire potion/poison and trap making as well. Cunning and Persuasion work the same away, these are gameplay skills.
Thorton does have something similar in ONE situation where he can get data and save his ally at the same time if he has a specific skill.
As for blank slate protagonists. The character in Jade Empire worked well enough, as did Revan, the Exile ( know you hate KOTOR 2 ) and so on.
I would however argue that the few cases where you can be proactive do not make up for the idiocy you are forced to get involved in Dragon Age: Origins....Awakening for all it's faults though, and it does have them even on a purely story level, never has you being forced to act like a complete imbecile and does indeed present many opportunities to act intelligently and proactively.
Quite frankly that's why I have hopes for DA:I. Because if it's Awakening 2.0, but far bigger and better then it will be a fun ride.