That looks so bad......if the final game looks like that I'll be disappointed big time.
- Status
That looks so bad......if the final game looks like that I'll be disappointed big time.
Effect is there. But its not realtime light.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-9t8ppBDLU#t=1m57s Geralt is not wet here. But light still bounces to him. Not only him. Also around So not big deal. Or may be even different art style. But first one was cool.
---------- Updated at 02:12 PM ----------
What looks so bad? Game looks amazing. Every aspect of it just amazing. Not SOD quality. But still beautiful. And "ULTRA"still there. )))))))))
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anybody know when will come out that new trailer/gameplay that the facebook page announced? Last Sunday they said stay tuned, best is yet to come, and still nothing. Maybe they said something in the polish forum, I noticed that REDs communicate with fans there more than here.
I really hoped that new footage (if it is footage) will end all of this downgrade talk
I really hoped that new footage (if it is footage) will end all of this downgrade talk
"Soon" is all we know, could be today who knows.
---------- Updated at 02:35 PM ----------
Everything....look at the lighting inside the cave and the foliage, so bad. Geralt's face seems like it has lost detail from the 35 min demo. Everything about it just looks downgraded from the 35 min demo. Just my opinion and what I am noticing.
I get what you're saying, but at the same time what you are doing is assuming that I'm making assumptions. I wasn't assuming anything that you claimed I was. I was simply stating facts. If you want to jump to conclusions based upon those facts then of course you're free to do so but please don't put words in my mouth.
It is a fact that when a game engine is rendering fewer assets simultaneously it will perform better than when rendering more assets simultaneously. That was my only point. No more, no less. To determine what assets the engine was rendering (and which it was not) simply watch the video. The effects shown are even labeled and anything not shown obviously wasn't being rendered since it wasn't present in the first place (no creatures shown roaming the gameworld, no combat shown, no spell effects shown, etc., etc.). I did not say these features were "turned on or turned off". I said these gameplay elements weren't shown in the video hence they weren't being rendered, regardless if the assets were or were not implemented in the build used (which is besides the point).
Just to make sure I'm being as clear as possible... imagine a game engine rendering nothing but scenery. Now add a single wolf to that scenery. Now add five wolves moving about to the scenery. Now add Geralt fighting those wolves using flashy moves and casting spells with spell effects. Now add blood splattering when Geralt cuts a wolf. Now add a lightning strike in the background and wind blowing leaves about. Each time a new asset is added to the scene it becomes more and more demanding to render that scene.
What did the nVidia video show? A bunch of empty scenery. It did not show any gameplay elements so the engine only had to render the scenery.
Last edited:
Last know footage when no one complained: (September 2014)
Even if just static screenshots...
This is how it should have stayed. No one would talk about a downgrade right now.
But I am sure the framerate was unstable at that point and console versions could not afford something like that.
Right now it seems like the smoke/fog/ that nasty feeling have just vanished.
Like if the "Rated M for mature"... was now a "Rated E for everyone"
I hope at least they will tone down the over-saturation that the game seems to have right now.
For the sake of Geralt and Andrzej Sapkowski's vision:
Last edited:
What do you mean? The color is casted on Gerald's foot. Watch the actual video if you don't believe me. What is different is the actual particle, changing from a fogy purple to something more akin to a beam.
Hey guys, here's a 4k screenshot from Marcin, go wild. www.bit.ly/WildHunt4K
Attachments
-
Witcher3_4K.jpg
Last edited:
That looks really good. Vegetation looks great too. I wonder what PC can actually run it at 4k though
@alexanderros
That looks beautiful... And it also shows the difference the weather conditions can make, for the atmosphere. Cloudy weather changes all the colour schemes, which is as it should be. (By the way, are those semi-volumetric clouds that I'm seeing in the distance?
)
Oh, thanks for sharing here by the way
That looks beautiful... And it also shows the difference the weather conditions can make, for the atmosphere. Cloudy weather changes all the colour schemes, which is as it should be. (By the way, are those semi-volumetric clouds that I'm seeing in the distance?
)Oh, thanks for sharing here by the way
I'm sure folks at NASA will be happy with the full experience.
It looks very pretty indeed.
Ok, that's the SOD vegetation, rising from the LOW RESOLUTION ground texture:
View attachment 11445
I Retract my clam on plants from a while ago. Thought this is still not ultra given the crappy SSAO that gives Gerald this bad hallow.
View attachment 11445
I Retract my clam on plants from a while ago. Thought this is still not ultra given the crappy SSAO that gives Gerald this bad hallow.
Attachments
-
The_Witcher_3_Wild_Hunt_War_ravaged_these_lands,_nobody_lives_here_anymore.jpg
Last edited:
That looks way better and different than the gameplay footage we have seen so far, especially the foliage.
I'd say this is on Ultra settings.
Everyone can rest easy now. It' gorgeous. It will be gorgeous on high-end PCs. It will be slightly less gorgeous on less high end PCs. It will still look really freaking good on counsels.
@Marcin Momot Dammit, now we can't keep on circlejerking, we'll have to find something else to argue about
- Status