This grass has become that bad and blurry based on those screenshots it may as well be green filled, grass shaped silhouettes.
This grass has become that bad and blurry based on those screenshots it may as well be green filled, grass shaped silhouettes.
Yup, the direct links work, but after asking around, I think they were originally on this page:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/ar...witcher-3-wild-hunt-nvidia-geforce-gtx-bundle
and then removed.
To be honest, my guess is that someone in Nvidia's PR fucked up and included year-old images, only to get screamed at afterwards.
I'm not going to disagree with everyone who things those two shots are crap. But I'd prefer to judge based on content known to be current. I think that the comparison of those walls actually has "Old" and "New" the wrong way round.
(Incidentally, there's no real need for anyone to click on those image links. They are, as stated, the two images that everyone's been talking about)
that's almost what it looks like lol. It's extremely chunky looking. Hell, fallout new vegas and fallout 3 grass and shrubs looked better than this. Those games are old by todays standards.
the monster looks awesome. In generally speaking IMO always when it comes to games. Still pictures look way worse than when u actually see it in motion on your PC/console
Just chiming in about those nvidia screens. I think it was established on NeoGaf(can't remember which thread exactly) that those nvidia shots had all manner of graphical features, and post-processing disabled. To highlight specific nvidia technologies. They realized the shitstorm they then created, and promptly removed them.
Just chiming in about those nvidia screens. I think it was established on NeoGaf(can't remember which thread exactly) that those nvidia shots had all manner of graphical features, and post-processing disabled. To highlight specific nvidia technologies. They realized the shitstorm they then created, and promptly removed them.
The Witcher 1 foliage is on par if not better than what we are seeing here.
No offence to CDPR but at this point, GTA 5 (a two year old game) with very high grass (yes, very high not ultra) settings on PC beat the entire foliage of Witcher 3.
Maybe you should also compare the game budgets as well.
Well yeah, we all know texture resolution and foliage density increases with the budged. $0.25 per 10 pixels and $0.05 per blade of grass (or set, since that's how the vegetation is displaced).Maybe you should also compare the game budgets as well.
Maybe you should try comparing this with a field of tall grass in similar weather in W3 to try making a point? You are cherry picking some shots that look good, there are awesome looking location in W3 as well.
They already had the high quality assets created, it would COST MORE to create new lower quality assets so your argument is invalid.Maybe you should also compare the game budgets as well.
Stop making excuses. It's plainly obvious to anyone not in denial that the foliage has taken a HUGE hit in quality all thanks to the consoles.
Go watch PS4 gta 5 grass and be amazed
Stop making excuses. It's plainly obvious to anyone not in denial that the foliage has taken a HUGE hit in quality all thanks to the consoles.
Go watch PS4 gta 5 grass and be amazed
No thanks. I'll just watch it on PC at 4k