Let's keep it simple, I like what Witcher 3 has become. If you agree with that, then we're on the same page.
I don't think you can dismiss the issues I brought up with your way of thinking and then assume we're on the same page simply because we both like the same game. We may be looking at the same 3D model, but we're both looking at it from very different perspectives, mate. I am not offended that you've dismissed my argument, but I am consciously taking this into account. It's not the greatest of forms.
I'm willing to accept if she's not beautiful, just please don't make her look like a man, is that seriously too much to ask?
Your illustations of 'male' and 'female' skulls: The woman's face overlayed over the 'male' skull is proportionally correct.The edited female version is not and looks very strange to me. Sure the woman may seem masculine, but if you look at real women's faces -- real faces, that I might add, are the best source for inspiration -- that's what they look like. I find it difficult to explain -- she's just an average looking woman. I'd say she isn't masculine. There are *very* few real people who look the way you're suggesting. At this point, it's not about diversity, but about realism.
If you like cartoony style, so be it, but you can't really complain about those sorts of issues in realistic looking videogames.
I understand you find this particular character unattractive, but there illustrative/story/characteristion reasons for this. They don't *just* design characters for the purpose of being attractive for X audience (actually they do, it's you, believe it or not, so I'm not sure how this is an issue except for the fact it happened in
one game). I personally think if they write what they write and base the character design appropriate to that written design, then there's no issue. Physical aesthetic is just a pure arse chance thing that you may end up being attracted to the design.
Okay let's compromise. I'm willing to sacrifice a lot to make you happy. How about 99% of the women are normal and fugly looking, but just have one romance option for straight males in which she looks hot, is that okay?
There's something really cringey about this statement. How about having no quotas whatsoever, like you were saying before about companies being PC?