Yet the fans of that time (including me) appreciated that game for the new ideas it brought to the table, loved it for it's rich lore and all the amazing aspects.
No, the fans of that time whined horribly about Triss in TW1.
Yet the fans of that time (including me) appreciated that game for the new ideas it brought to the table, loved it for it's rich lore and all the amazing aspects.
No, the fans of that time whined horribly about Triss in TW1.
No, the fans of that time whined horribly about Triss in TW1.
Sorry won't comment on it anymore, I am done with the nonsense way people treat each and every choice devs make for their game. I would like them to have some creative freedom not fan forced bomb of ideas dropped on their heads every time.
It made a lot of sense when we asked them for the missing wolf school gear and they listened to it very well but this ? this is going way overboard.
Of course they should have creative freedom. But creative freedom doesn't mean "I can do what I want to do".
You can't for example create Ciri with red hair.
Ouch, 23 pages are a bit too much to read, so I apologize if it has been already answered: do we have any ETA on the DLC?
Quite disappointed with how it looks, anyway!
That's exactly what creative freedom means.
That is what creative freedom means if we're talking about a world or a character created form scratch.
But if you are designing a character or a clothing for a character created by a different author...your creative freedom comes to an end when you are working on something that has been described by the original author.
This is why you can't design Geralt with black hair and homosexual, for example.
Of course they should have creative freedom. But creative freedom doesn't mean "I can do what I want to do".
You can't for example create Ciri with red hair, or Geralt with raven hair.
That is what creative freedom means if we're talking about a world or a character created form scratch.
But if you are designing a character or a clothing for a character created by a different author...your creative freedom comes to an end when you are working on something that has been described by the original author.
This is why you can't design Geralt with black hair and homosexual, for example.
And they haven't done anything like that, like I said before they just gave her a lighter version of something similar to Skellige armor. It has some elements of tribal look as well, overall it's a very good design as far as my opinion goes but sadly it's just getting huge load of shitty backlash.
It seems you just ignored my last post lol, even the original author is less concerned than some of you, this is what Andrzej Sapkowski has to say about the game
Developers can base games on good sci-fi or fantasy books, their worlds, their stories, their heroes, and then beautify them with artwork and a bit of borrowed dialogue, Sapkowski said. "The visual effect will be stunning, the players delighted - some might even consider it to be better and easier digestible than the original book, because in the book the letters are so small.... Some will never even reach for the original book; as for them, the game will be enough," he believes.
"But it is the book that's the original, this book is the result of the author's unique, inimitable talent. 'Transfer a book into a virtual world'? Funny. It's impossible."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...r-of-the-witcher-books-thinks-about-the-games
So while he's happy that the game is inspired from his books he doesn't want to correlate them to this extent.
Bit too much outrage over a pixel midriff in a game to be entirely normal, for mine.
I find it a bit meh personally, but the sheer outrage and angst over it? Way over the top.
Originally Posted by goopit