I mentioned the betrayal because I don't see Triss as a big sister of Ciri, not in the end of the books (yes in the beginning) or the games. Just a "friend" like could be Lambert or Eskel.
- Status
I mentioned the betrayal because I don't see Triss as a big sister of Ciri, not in the end of the books (yes in the beginning) or the games. Just a "friend" like could be Lambert or Eskel.
Yeah right, you definitely came here to discuss Yennefer and Ciri content. I can clearly see that when reading your post.
This is not a topic to discuss Triss and her romance. Please keep that in mind. We don't discuss Yennefer in yours either.
You forgot Gilthoniel quote Triss topic and literally said all dev comment here in the forum care only about Triss
Again with the same song? Triss is not Yennefer towards Ciri. Triss is nothing more than a friend to Ciri (who betrayed her once) and Yen is HER MOTHER. Please, don't compare.
She's not a friend to her, she's an older sister, who helped her a lot when she was younger and she did need that help, that happened before Ciri even met Yennefer. Let's not forget that It was through her intervention that Ciri was not inadvertently given harmful hormones which might have negatively impacted her "womanly assets".
Ciri wouldn't have be "Ciri" if not for Triss and I think she's as important to her as Yennefer, that's my opinion.
And that was point of my original post few pages ago...they responded there and said they are TRISS FANS too.
Oh, I think when people want to do a romance to be the key of a story or more focused on it than other aspects like the poor villain, it is a problem. Definitely.
Yennefer made a mistake that was a lot bigger than Triss's, that much I can assure you. That mistake almost killed Geralt.
The point she brings up is fair though. Just like any point of yours and few other Triss fans who are actually capable
of objective opinions and suggestions.
Thank you for being awesome. I love you!
Not exactly. I was responding to this.
With this.
And the rest, well, it's the internet.
Yeah right, you definitely came here to discuss Yennefer and Ciri content. I can clearly see that when reading your post.
This is not a topic to discuss Triss and her romance. Please keep that in mind. We don't discuss Yen in yours either.
You forgot to quote that part
That doesn't means Yen romance is ''perfect'', i know there is the lack of mother-daughter relationship and a not so good introduction for her.
And you take my answer out of context, it was an answer to another person, not you.
It is my opinion - yeah - they said they are also Triss fans...it is nothing wrong about this statement but don't get me wrong that I have a feeling some of them really care only about Triss if they are Triss fans lol
Completely diffirent POV between us with the book then.
And if i think right, in your playthough, even when Triss decide to leave for Kovir forever to not interfere with Geralt and Yen again, she still come back to defend Kaer Mohen for Ciri, Yen and Geralt because she care about them
And i don't see any problem of being TRISS fan, Konrad say he is forever with YEN too right
@Redemyr if you felt like my post was directed to you at all then I apologize deeply, because it wasn't. It was universal.
You sir are awesome and I love you!
You sir are awesome and I love you!
She did that mistake thinking it would be the best choice for Ciri. Triss, instead, did her choice knowing it would be always BAD for Ciri.
I'd say the hug moment is special like vesemir's but different from Triss. There's other family moments (lodge/aballach's lab) where they certainly don't act that strangers IMO. The lodge moment felt a real family moment of friction. At bald mountain ciri-Geralt talk about yen's reaction which is clearly that to a stranger. So no I don't see your stranger perception. Like I said I think there's a case for another moment of counterpoint to show the intimacy.
Geralt and Ciri act like family IMO. Yen doesn't... A zero on the left. And any single nice word or gesture of Ciri towards Yen.
The romance is a part of a beautiful game which CDPR has created, I think that considering this is the last game that people deserve to have more romance with the characters they love. If CDPR didn't care about the romance in the game as much as they did, it wouldn't have been the same game we're currently playing.
I think that from reading the books, I've established enough about those characters and some of them already have too much history with Geralt, I'd rather focus on what we currently have in the game, because there is no point of dwelling on what was added from the books and what wasn't.
When we play a game this huge and with this enormous number of people playing it and discussing it, it's very difficult for CDPR to satisfy everyone.
People are upset about the lack of conversations with Eredin, people are upset about the way Yennefer was introduced, people are upset about the lack of interaction between Yennefer and Ciri, people are upset about the romance between Triss and Geralt, people are upset about the interaction between Triss and Ciri.
Points that are raised by the community are discussed between designers and leads, most often. If we agree that something needs to change, we approach production and it is discussed in more detail and with all people who are affected involved. If overall we agree something needs to be changed, we look at how we can make adjustments and what would be required to really fix any given issue.
At that point it is pretty much out of designers hands. We may get the go ahead to do the changes or we may not. This can have various reasons. None of these include us being too lazy to do it.
For obvious reasons I cannot discuss specifics. Hope this gives a bit more of an idea of how we process your feedback here.
This quote should answer it.
Oh... sure... that's why Ciri puts herself in danger to rescue Yennefer and calls her MOTHER.
And we all know a mother is like a friend.
NO.
Last edited:
- Status