Most likely player choice not Geralt from the books.When did it happen? Everything was his own choice, there never was anything like what you say.
Most likely player choice not Geralt from the books.When did it happen? Everything was his own choice, there never was anything like what you say.
Most likely player choice not Geralt from the books.
I play not by the book Geralt, but play with my heart.
We were talking about the events of TW1 and TW2, not about what Geralt-from-the-book-who-didn't-have-amnesia would do. And in TW1 and TW2 (I say this about TW1 without saying "option" because of how TW2 started) he chooses Triss.Most likely player choice not Geralt from the books.
Nope, I didn't extract it, I joined our hearts into one.Was it hard to extract Geralt's heart and insert your own instead?
Then you shouldn't trust Dandelion, Zoltan, other witchers because they didn't tell him about Yennefer either.
In TW1 all suffered by selected amnesia sindrom.It's really hard to explain why they did hide any information about Ciri and Yennefer from Geralt in TW1. Only Triss's silence looks reasonable.
I have only real explanation - TW1 devs team wanted to make a real new story about Geralt. About new Geralt.
:what2:: The first rule of YenneferCiri - you don't talk about YenneferCIri
:surprised:: Sure
:skepticalzoltan:: Got it
:wondering:: My lips are sealed
But the devs from TW2 decided to turn back to background. And SUDDENLY Dandelion acts like "Pfff, Geralt, are you silly, I thought you know about Ciri and Yen that's why I thought I don't have to tell you".
In TW1 all suffered by selected amnesia sindrom.
No. It's player choice. I can chose Shani or not romance Triss in W2. So it's wrong to say Geralt chose as it's totally player choice. The only choice Geralt made is Geralt from books and his choice well known.We were talking about the events of TW1 and TW2, not about what Geralt-from-the-book-who-didn't-have-amnesia would do. And in TW1 and TW2 (I say this about TW1 without saying "option" because of how TW2 started) he chooses Triss.
And he still ends up being with Triss.No. It's player choice. I can chose Shani
She is romaced by default, you can choose not to give her the Rose, but she is still considered a love interest, because there is this "parting" after TW2, you can't "part" with your ordinary friend. You are trying to deny what really was in the game and that it was Geralt, not some other witcher.not romance Triss in W2
The only thing you can say about TW3 is that you have to choose. If Yennefer was romanced by default, it would be canon, even if you could part with her. But he doesn't, so canon in TW3 is having a choice between them.If you think W3 has canon than Geralt didn't choose Triss as he breaks with her after W2.
And it means that Geralt chose Triss and it doesn't depend on player.In W2 Triss romance is forced at the start
It's up to player how to speak with her, but it's up to Geralt if she is his love interest at this point or not. And she is, considering they still have to part after those events.you can chose not to trust her and not to have any romance scenes except first one. So it's up to player. Not Geralt.
It is canon that he chose her and it is canon they broke. Nothing's wrong with this statement.But even this isn't canon as at the start of W3 they are on their own.
So Triss with Geralt is canon only for W2 start.
Triss is canon for the whole W2 and, considering they are together in W2, for TW1 too.It's up to player how to speak with her, but it's up to Geralt if she is his love interest at this point or not. And she is, considering they still have to part after those events.
Triss is canon for the whole W2 and, considering they are together in W2, for TW1 too.
I know. It still means that Triss' choice was preferable, though I can agree that calling it "canon" is a bit wrong.If you romanced Shani in TW1,you get this journal entry:
I know. It still means that Triss' choice was preferable, though I can agree that calling it "canon" is a bit wrong.
Nah it's ok. It reminds me books Triss who was ready to sell her sould in order to be with Geralt. She is so obsessed with him that is hurts...I'd prefer for Triss romance to be canon in TW1,instead of having this stupid journal entry.If Geralt chose Shani in TW1,then he breaks up with Triss for a second time ,but she's still totally ok to try again with Geralt in TW2.Girl,have some self respect.
Nah it's ok. It reminds me books Triss who were ready to sell her sould in order to be with Geralt. She is so obsessed with him that is hurts...
I meant this myself. Still they had to justify not having consequences of choice made in TW1, so this entry could appear.I'd prefer for Triss romance to be canon in TW1,instead of having this stupid journal entry.If Geralt chose Shani in TW1,then he breaks up with Triss for a second time ,but she's still totally ok to try again with Geralt in TW2.Girl,have some self respect.
Remember how many times Geralt and Yen broke up in booksbreaks up with Triss for a second time ,but she's still totally ok to try again with Geralt in TW2.Girl,have some self respect.
He probably meant her asking Ciri to sail with them at the end of the last book.I thought that by the end of the books she grown out of it.