Well they have said their updating the red endine for next gen, so i think we can expect some really cool things
TheStalkWitcher said:
Not sure, but I would say Witcher 2 alpha was an early version of the Red Engine, not the Aurora Engine.
TheStalkWitcher said:so I hope they will optimize it like the unreal engine 3
There is no game made with Unreal Engine 3 that is beautiful as TW2, so it's hard to compare optimization. UE3 is designed to make games for X360 and PS3 and those consoles are very old - so no wonder that those games are running nicely on PC.
Also there is no game made with UE3 that would have comparable locations and architecture (cities with lots of NPCs). Only TERA Online is like that and it's terribly optimized.
Check Samaritan demo. It's made on UE3,5 - tease of UE4 designed for next generation. Soon you will need much stronger PC than you need for TW2 to play games that will be made on this engine.
Chromie92 said:
I don't need it. I played Crisis 2 on DirectX9 and on DirectX11 and only noticeable difference were better vehicle tracks on the ground and 15% lower FPS. >.>
Also I checked list of games that supports DX11 and most of them have so freakin' ugly graphics... Maybe 4 or 5 games have nice graphics but they also have DX9 support.
For me DX11 is worth nothing. It adds so little and needs so much, that it's not worth any effort.
And I'm saying that even tho I have high-end graphics card.
They've already said RED engine is a work in progress. CyberPunk will look awesome.
Aver said:I don't need it. I played Crisis 2 on DirectX9 and on DirectX11 and only noticeable difference were better vehicle tracks on the ground and 15% lower FPS. >.>
Also I checked list of games that supports DX11 and most of them have so freakin' ugly graphics... Maybe 4 or 5 games have nice graphics but they also have DX9 support.
For me DX11 is worth nothing. It adds so little and needs so much, that it's not worth any effort.
And I'm saying that even tho I have high-end graphics card.
Oh please. Look at Battlefield 3 not the graphics but at how well the game runs. I can play at 60 fps at 1920x1200 on a single HD 5770. DX11 runs amazingly well and would love to see Cyberpunk utilize DX11 performance enhancing features.
Chromie92 said:
On lowest settings I suppose... Every benchmark that I found show that 5770 on high (not highest) settings doesn't run even on 40 FPS.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/battlefield-3-graphics-performance,3063-8.html
And on low settings even TW2 will run 60+ FPS on 5770.