Recent content by Vedamir

2021-й год - турнир из 6 китайцев. 2022-й год - турнир из 8-ми китайцев.

No, initially Gwent was a funny and gambling CARD game. Armies was just a pictures on the cards. And this cards was collectiblle. Now we have an imitation of a real army in a real world, but not a deck. This new idea has come from the Thronebreaker, but I don't like it (as many people too). It's...

As for me, I don't like oversaturated graphics. And I don't like childish graphics too. I just want the game to be lighter, more neat, more official, more fanfare and royal as it initially was. And as it was in W3. U must understand, that W3 is the parent of the Gwent. I think all design ideas...

Yes. It's looking ridiculous, but it's true. U r not right, cause Gwent isn't dark game. And Witcher's universe isn' t dark too. It's gray. But Gwent is a game of FUN. It was never boring. It was never dark. Fun cannot be dark. People play card games for FUN. Black - is not color of fun. Black...

Batman isn't so popular like Power Rangers or Spiderman or other comics heroes, who make their business in the daylight.

I agree with that: cards' design is different to the whole game. It's ragged and sloppy. So I don't understand, how noone of designers doesn't even see it for so much time. The only reason is - darkness. They cannot see because of darkness. Developers are depressed becuase they created dark...

It's almost an year left since I've started this thread. Since that nothing changed to the look of Gwent. Still it is dark, dirty and unpopular. Did u know that Bethesda's TES Legends is closed? Guess, what design does it has? The same dark and dirty. Dark things are doomed to be forgotten and...

I have something else to say here. Since I left Gwent, I went to Hearthstone. I don't fully like this game, but it is the best alternative, I think. It is light, it is fun, it's friendly and diversive. And now they have released a new mode, that everyone has heard of - Battlegrounds. It's very...

I don't play Gwent any more) I just cryticize :coolstory:

I think, it shouldn't until the core problems are solved: dark dirty design, slow and too controllable order-like mechanics, boringness, senselessness of rows, leaders and cards.

А что толку? Вы лучше его на PC допилите до нормального состояния. А потом уже на платформы разпространяйте. Если игра - мусор, нет никакого смысла её портировать. Даже на PC почти никто в "это" не играет.

Since I left Gwent, I tryed to return a to make some decks, learn new cards. And what did I see? Geralt: Axii, that clearing and restoring unit! What the ***ng shit is this? Don't u really know what is Axii? How can it clear and restore? It's mind control! I just deleted this game until such...

Ok, but there is no a big sense in showing artifacts on the left side of a row or in a middle place, made for global effects. It's ok, when artifact affects the whole board or the whole row. But when it affects a unit, it must be displayed on a unit. if it affects a hero, it must be displayed on...

Yes, it's one of the ideas. As I suggested in another post, melee row is always a defender for the ranged as it is in reality. Only archers and some other units (mages, agents) can attack ranged disregarding the melee. Another units (like crossbowmen and warriors) must destroy the melee first...

As I said, I should split all current artifacts into two categories: weapons and buildings. Buildings are mostly doing nothing to the battlefield, so they must not have power. But they are destroyable, so they can have an armor to control them. There can exist some cards, that deal a great...