So that reminds me...have they informed players on the contents of these patches before release like their statement noted? There's a separate thread regarding the next patch and everyone there seems to be in the dark.
So that reminds me...have they informed players on the contents of these patches before release like their statement noted? There's a separate thread regarding the next patch and everyone there seems to be in the dark.
So that reminds me...have they informed players on the contents of these patches before release like their statement noted? There's a separate thread regarding the next patch and everyone there seems to be in the dark.
I shouldn't have been centered around V dying but rather V overcoming the biochip and finding a way to survive. The endings were sad but not beautiful, they were the opposite of that
I have, and all i seen is devs talks about how game is and journalists twisting devs words into something else. There are some minor features that were removed if you ONLY listen to what the devs actually say and most of those are balance issues which i personally understand as a game developer.
Spending 50 hours to save your character from dying and then have the game go "HAHA SIKE BITCH!" in the last 20 minutes isn't preferable.nah I think that would've been too hollywood or fantasy for this world
Game looks amazing for me but surely it needs improvements.
I really do think that Cyberpunk will be GOTY for PC after bug fixes.
Also I am happy that CD Projekt is dealing well with the lawsuits and hope there will be no bad impact. We already see a great improvement after patch 1.1 and more is yet to come.
Spending 50 hours to save your character from dying and then have the game go "HAHA SIKE BITCH!" in the last 20 minutes isn't preferable.
Yes but its really hard to compare those two games. Most of towns in RDR2 have like 15 houses and 30 NPCs. Its nicely done but scale is so much different. You cant program hundreds of NPCs to do that, although I agree that they could improve crowd behaviour a bit - less frequent 180 turns and respawn and I`ll be happy.
This game is like the legacy of Gibson and the original series of Cyberpunk combined in a body that is stuffed with faulty chrome and cyberware to a point it became fubar.this video game truly embodies all the legacy of William Gibson and the cyber of the 80s.
I am really disappointed that few have focused on this topic
View attachment 11199925
I disagree but I guess it's a matter of taste,This game is like the legacy of Gibson and the original series of Cyberpunk combined in a body that is stuffed with faulty chrome and cyberware to a point it became fubar.
I completely agree with you, there are whole parts that they are making nods to "sprawl trilogy" that clear that I'm surprised that Gibson didn't asked for royalties.I disagree but I guess it's a matter of taste,
in many details of this game I find citations of cyberpunk works and I really like this every time it happens
I think we are trying to forcibly find errors in order to be able to criticize it
if this game had been called deus ex 5 or fallout 5, it would not have suffered all this criticism
Hopefully when the expansions finally emerge i guess in 2022