Search results

IF that Australian law would hold in Polish Court. Consider this, a lot of people have chosen to buy kegs in closed beta, to be denied the game they have invested in. Do you think CDPR can risk such a precedent? If one gets refunded, everyone gets refunded. It would be a nightmare for them.

All these years, all these changes. Still moans, still moans. Less the math and the structure, the fun, the lore and the future, the magic and uniqueness all got denied by bleakness.

Anyone remembers this? Good old times. Seems like a few names made it into the game. Although it might be just a coincidence. By the way, this still works: https://accounts.zoho.eu/signin Login Details: guestopbonkers@gmail.com Free@ccess123

I'm not. tah tah

When someone says "overhaul" in gwent context I cringe so much I have to hold on to my innards.

Ban for not providing a new Rover each year.

^ Ban for being a maverick, dissident and a rebel. You can't ban yourself under no circumstances.

noir the nothing then :)

brain?

A bloke complained about game lacking creativity. Creativity is supposed to be your job, innit?

did someone post a picture?

Depends on your metabolism as well. Mine for example is very slow. No cardio no poop. But we have fart and poop expert here on the forum. Bubbles?

You're right. Couldn't agree more. Developers should indeed please the fanbase. What I don't like is the way fanbase is trying to achieve it. Forcing and demanding to obey makes me feel like being part of entitled and spoiled community. Even if the movement in this thread achieves it's goals...

I'm confused what you accusing me off. Please explain.

Your original Question was "how did they understand it". You're definitely playing your trump card of people reading bits and peaces not the whole thing. Smart. Also all these question you asked me. how is that relevant to my original argument? In debate you take one thought and try to answer...

They read it. In terms of "we" wanted. I'm standing here and you over there. We're arguing. How can anyone interpret that to be a sensible, directional, one-dimensional opinion? Now put that in grand scheme. Which path to take. One of el_Bosco or Karls?? Or anyone else's in between. No clue, no...

That suggests you want to force it. Forcing someone do something they don't want is proved wrong in a number of occasions. Always had bad aftermath.