Search results

I played Dragon Age 2 in like 30 hours. A bit more. It felt very short. I played the Witcher recently and it took me like 50, 60 hours. More. I expect TW2 to take as long and more. So don't panic, there is a big difference between playing it knowing it and NOT knowing it.

The music is good and the song may be good but it doesn't ryme. That makes it clash in my ears.

It is the one who shouldn't be named. Cause naming CALLS! We may attract bad luck!!

Ah, but I would play TW2 AND TW3 even if they didn't look any better than TW1.

Damn, I had 10,000 oren, the armor, the swords and potions.

Or if ME3 flops.

I have seen the trailer. Its looks remind me of TW2. No real idea what the game is about. But I am not much into fighting. The rpg part is where it is at for me. Killing monsters and fighting people is just part of the story, not the core of the game.

If Two Worlds could spawn a sequel (even as lousy as Two Worlds 2) a merely mediocre game like DA2 can have an equally mediocre sequel, or maybe a bit better than mediocre. Everything seems to aim towards a big war and things happening in Orlais. So the franchise is safe. Now all we have to do...

aaarrggggg!!!!!!

THAT is the problem, I couldn't. I had to lower the resolution. Isometrics, I think. I couldn't go to the marsh unless I did it. And the Trade Quarter the same. Crashes or slow. Especially with lots of moving characters on the screen. I blame the game. It required MANY patches and upgrades. I...

I think we are panicking and making a mountain of a molehill. So far the game LOOKS good, the story SEEMS interesting, the combat system SHOULD be acceptable and we have NO proof of any flaw of any kind. Lets play it before we go into mourning because not being PC exclusive ruined it. Even DA2...

I have seen what Two Worlds 2 looks like and for a game that just came out it looks like it is five years old and more. TW1 looks better. So I can live with a TW3 that doesn't look as great as TW2. I am no purist and to me the story is the principal subject. DA2 looked good but the story sucked...

Mods do not appeal to me. Free extra content is very welcome, though. No matter where it fit. If I have to pay for it I would prefer it to be shaped like an extension.

To me a worthwhile DLC would have to add stuff to the game AFTER the end of the game. New quests. EA did it with Witch Hunt but they don't have the pure motivation necessary to make it good. We are all scared that to get money RED will sell out and ruin the game.

Some people say they had trouble with the combat. So did I. With the combat in any game but Oblivion. Because I got the cheat. I don't CARE about the fighting, the roleplaying is where it is at for me. I fought all I had to and the WASD and the mouse were enough. I think some people like too...

Having survived consistent CRASHES my problem is not with black lines around the edges as much as whether any computer but the latest will be able to play it. If it can play TW, can it play TW2?

I couldn't care less whether they make it also for consoles. If they get to make money that way more power to them. BUT. Assassins' Creed Brotherhood came out for consoles first and nobody bothered saying when it would come out for PC until MONTHS passed. Same for Fable3. I hope RedProjekt...

I only play PC games and I am bitting my nails to the elbow waiting for TW2.

I never had much use for the signs and used them only when I had no choice. Potions and swordmanship seems to be the way to go. The signs were often unreliable. When compared with potions.

I know, I know. I am just SO disappointed! DA2 was supposed to be Conan with elves and darkspawn. Instead it felt like a ripoff. I have bought as many video games(PC and console)as any three normal players and I don't mind the money. But I want quality.