Search results

Except Sauron and the Nazgul had a constant menacing presence that Eredin did not have.

This is why I hope in the romance fixes patch or whatever they let Geralt give it back or something and say, "You know how I feel about elven legends..." Or something to that effect.

What do we do now...? :huh:

Wow I haven't been on this thread for awhile and I come back to this! :wat: I don't know how they will handle it, but I am sure it will be good because CDPR is very passionate about their games! :respect:

I am fairly certain the Triss ordeal will get fixed in some way. It would be foolish and unlike CDPR to ignore the largest thread on their forum (ever?). I would actually lose a lot of respect for them if they don't address some story issues (mainly Triss).

I doubt they are talking about any story related changes unfortunately.

That's good to know. I thought for a moment I could kinda understand what fan girls feel a little bit. :huh:

I wish a RED would atleast tell us a reason why. I've said before how strange it is because Triss went from the female mascot of The Witcher to a side character. I just don't think CDPR would neglect their character they spent so much time on for any reason - but they did.

A lot of things could have been better regarding continuity from Witcher 2. A conversation with Yen (even if you imported a save) would have made the choices you made atleast feel acknowledged.

I could have sworn that I saw an article stating CDPR asked him to review and he went over the main plots of the first game's script and approved them. I tried looking for a source, but I can't find one. Maybe I imagined it. :troll:

Some people insist that Geralt and Triss in The Witcher games is too far fetched - saying how Andrzej Sapkowski never intended for them to be together. I call bullshit, even some excerpts from the books can prove that. Even though he no longer sees the games as part of the same canon, people...

I knew I saw that before. That really is amazing and shows great attention to detail CDPR had even in The Witcher 1.

A topic that has gotten brought up in this discussion was the amount of sex scenes. Some people say Triss needs more while others think it contributes nothing. I think Triss could use another. The elven bath house was a great scene and nothing will ever top it though... :whistle: In "The Sword...

It was Eredin's projection. CDPR seemed to want to create a game that was easy for newcomers. I think this is the worst decision ever made. Why the hell would you make the last game of a trilogy so accessible to newcomers?!

The Elven Bath scene was so amazing and watching it again makes me feel even worse about what CDPR did in Witcher 3. I just don't understand what went through their heads...

I haven't read this thread in awhile, but I am assuming you are still wanting CDPR to add a post game state? They already said they won't. If I'm not mistaken you couldn't play after The Witcher 1 or 2 either. The game is over when it is over, accept that. Play through the game again or reload...

I didn't mean witchers can't feel emotion or feel sad. I just remember Geralt commenting on how he cannot cry.

Everyone but witchers... :sad:

Despite what many say, I think that ending is not a good one, but it is probably the best. The reason it is the best is because you get to see you love interest and friends one last time. Saying goodbye to Ciri is also enough to make you cry once again. I got the witcheress ending and was really...

That's more than straying away from the topic at hand. While the soundtrack is great - this has absolutely zero relevancy to this thread. :popo: