Search results

@Shewaslvl18 As i have said in my prvious post.... "at no point did i say enemies needed to give exp because the player didnt have enough exp. I said killing enemies is pointless and unfulfulling and it would be a better more rewarding/enjoyable game if they gave it because then there would be...

@Barillius I think that's another strawman, Im guessing your referring to when i said it would not diminish the experience for those who like it the way it is, in which case you have misunderstood what im asking for... at no point did i say enemies needed to give exp because the player didnt...

takezodunmer2005 Thanks im sure that will help lots of people, my goal is to advocate for the issue so the devs dont make the same mistake again.

KuraBuraMaster Your right, some people are ok with it this way but have the people on this topic agree with me; which is why i said adding this feature would improve gameplay for those who dont like it without harming gameplay for those who do, no negative impact except on fanboys and add hours...

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. Voltaire again nothing but fallacies your argument has no worth and i have proven that by accurately identifying the fallacies. please learn how logic works again 50% of the people here agree with me, obviously more than opinion. and...

Barillius Again your logic completely fails. no where have i claimed anything about this game should be a mod-killing grinder, that IS actually a straw man unlike how you claimed i used one... The premise of my argument is that games are meant to be profitable by being fun and maintaining...

@Barillius No, you seem to not understand logic... when you claim someone has made a mistake you need to explain why/how. Like how did i misuse the word objectively? ob·jec·tive (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing...

Thx, im sure that will help lots of people, my goal is to advocate for the issue so the developers dont make the same mistake in the next game.

i had 3000 at lvl 6 on the hardest difficulty, what you do or don't need is irrelevant... my argument is that the game rewards not fighting more than fighting and thus makes fighting pointless depreciating the value of the game. yes i played through the first level twice, once playing normally...

@moonknightgog read the quote again, no opinion involved. ---------- Updated at 12:00 PM ---------- @Qaddis The player makes more money by avoiding combat and not using any repair/oils/potions/food/etc... and selling them, thus you make more money by not fighting, Fact go ahead and try it...

@Nilhilion, Again, criticizing something is important to improve it. The point is to show by how many people are experiencing this issue to show it would be an obvious improvement to the game, and so the makers don't make the same mistake ever again. and again saying "design choice" is a plea...

As you can both clearly see many people have experienced this issue, and adding the feature does not diminish the experience for people who don't like grinding enemies while it does improve the experience for those that do. and yes grinding is apart of the game but instead of grinding enemies...

No, the only difference is instead of grinding enemies now I grind quests and avoid all enemies because their pointless. when you can run past everything and to get all the rewards then theres no longer a reason to fight 90% of the non mission enemies in the game. Thats bad game design. and...

Many book/movie based games exist and in none of the original content does it say the hero goes around killing everything, yet in the game version that what happens because its fun... removing the fulfilling aspects of something fun to fit the narrative is like including real horse manure in the...

@Gothfather and @Darkarhon you've missed the point bro's, im playing on the hardest difficult have never repaired anything never use any potions/consumables and haven't had any difficulty playing the game. but their is literally no point in ever fighting enemies outside of the missions, they...

@Nilhilion Calling something a design choice (plea to authority fallacy), doesn't change whether its a good or bad gameplay aspect... people can make awful design choices...

at lvl 2 i killed a lvl 6 bear at lvl 4 i killed a lvl 11 bug at lvl 5 i killed a lvl 15 guard etc... etc... i get more satisfaction from complaining about how bad the xp given is then actually fighting the enemies, because its not rewarding.

Just beat an enemy 3 times my level, got 6 exp.... complete waste of time. Most missions when there are enemies in the pathways its worthless to fight them because of the low exp given, just run past and continue the mission is alway more effective.

@Yellowcardus no, has nothing to do with opinion, if you like smashing you head against a brick wall that is your opinion. If the game gives you less for more work, thats an objective punishment for an action. it is objectively true that by playing the game you will get more money and more...

@Yellowcardus Closer to the point, but not quite there yet... going to the markers on your map is not exploring and most of them are apart of missions... so are all quest items in skyrim when you explore (off the beaten path no mission no marker no objectives) you gain money and levels, its...