Search results

^Banned for trying to be endearing with your Stan & Ollie number, you're not fooling anyone wannabe skynet.

^Banned for endangering child lives by freely distributing real bans.

^Banned for scapegoating. ^_^

^Banned for not lying.

^banned for trying.

^Banned for not bringing treats.

^Maybe aunt Mei's melancholy made the makers misalign their tiMEtable emanating in the impediment, ban.

Maybe a lot of old cards could recieve a buff in terms of extra value with devotion.

^Banned because your ban is condescending towards other bans.

^Impatience ban.

Banned for exaggerating the word stretch into violate.

^Dejavu ban

Banned because of the lack of purple prose, V would be disappointed.

It's funny how you call it a neutral deck, but it's defining feature is a faction card xD... Shupe decks are neutral decks, cause every faction can build a better or worse version of it.

Nice to see the "NG players are just bad and lazy" series of white noise machines are still running strong.

Banned because a robot styling themselves a superhero seems like a recipe for disaster.

This is what people've been saying all along... Noone said vincent, Ball or Braathens are overpriced or bad now, the problem was these cards were carrying a weak faction with an assembly of powercrept bronzes and golds.

I think some people don't understand that just because a certain deck performs fairly well in certain matchups, but is overall still weak that doesn't make it really good but difficult to learn, it makes it just meh. And saying "it's good enough, just get better" where there's ample evidence...

The numbers must be wrong, as according to some completely unbiased people in the NG buffs thread, NG had atleast a 70% playrate, and a decent winrate too.

^Banned because the person in question is actually a robot with illegal biological implants and not a human with illegal cybernetic implants, and you failed to point that out and punish all parties accordingly!