Search results

Nonetheless... You're giving them credit for future content they haven't created yet?

You're giving them credit for future content they haven't created yet? And I think you got a typo there, you wrote "nope" should be "yep" because you're agreeing with what I said.

I usually take a very slow in-depth approach to open-world RPG's like CP2077, but once I realized the rest of the game map was closed to you, I treated the opening of the game more like a tutorial level you need to get through before the real game started. So I went straight to The Heist.

Sure, I'd like to think it to. But there's no particular think its the case. 1618347408 Didn't the Polish govt threaten them with action if they didn't fix the game? That's not a theory. My point being you can't give CDPR too much credit when the fact is they are being directed by an outside...

Ok, I was replying though to the OP who seemed to be saying that CDPR's statement should remove doubt about the game's future. Besides the patch they put out more likely reflects CDPR's legal responsibilities to fix the game because of action taken by their govt and an announcement of future DLC...

Why does CDPR saying saying something remove doubt? Isn't one of the reasons people are upset is because of all the thing CDPR said that ended up no being true?

Well when you say, "the state of the game" are you simply referring to the bugs and broken systems? Because that is a very different issue from the fact the game was woefully lacking in features, content and scope that CDPR was telling us were in the game. And that is not because of Covid. Keanu...

It is true the game was heavily marketed, promoted and sold on features that are not in the game. It's not just features. The scope of the game itself is so much less than what we were led to believe. And we were led to believe that why and by who? Because CDPR very deliberately wanted people to...

Thank you!

As far as I understood it (and lord knows I may not have, the story is all over the place) Saburo just wanted it for his own immortality? And yes, she was gone but being the original creator of the soulkiller it's possible she left a copy of her engram behind whne she escaped?

Well there'd be no game then. You just sit and chat.

It was really obvious the devs were trying to force an emotional bond between V and Jackie but I just never felt it. I didn't dislike him and I suppose I could have come to like him but the game acted like we were best friends and V was devastated by his loss but my response was always... "Sure...

Jut get a braindance!

This! This makes so much more sense in the context of the game. I know I've seen it discussed before but I'm still fuzzy on how/why it was decided to put a 50yo engram of a terrorist/rocker who hates Arakasa onto their prototype chip that was essentially intended to be used only for Saburo?

All of the reasonable in-game answers aside it likely reflects the fact that the game's story was re-written late in it's development cycle. In one of the trailers you can hear on the radio talking about Silverhand dying last year. So... I'm guessing the 50 year jump was added later in...

Like the OP, even though I'm on PC with relatively good performance (but a ton of graphical glitches(, my issues with the game are how far it falls short of being a fully fleshed out open-world RPG. I'm waiting for CDPR to address that. Bug fixes are important but bugs aren't the core problem...

I believe I articulated it quite well, I just used many fewer words to do it.

Starting my first game on the Corp life path, excited to experience the Cyperpunk corp lifestyle, finding out 10min in you're kicked out of the corp and are essentially a streetkid.

Actually they marketed on giving us more than what other games have given us. With respect to the actual game, they gave us far less than other much older open-world games gave us years ago. As far as embracing it, other than acknowledging bugs, has CDPR given any indication they acknowledge...

The game launched before they completed it.