I'll start with this; I think you got some the wrong idea from someone about book Geralt.Someday I would like CDPR to do a re-imagining of the Witcher in the eyes of the author of the books. I don't mind if they break away from the choices and have Geralt react like he would in the books. I haven't read the books but I've read up on what some of them contained and about Geralt being way more powerful than he is in the games and much better with the signs than he is now. I would love to see a game with the author's vision and see how that would be done in a game format. I would like to see how Triss for example would behave if she was cannon to the books and not taking advantage of Geralt. It would be awesome if the author was over seeing it![]()
He is not made out to be some super powerful guy in the books I'd say a decent amount weaker than in game. At most he takes on I think it's about 6 trained fighters, and pretty much any contract is a matter of life and death. The books it's more about him being stubborn and determined than about especially powerful.
As for signs I'd say games are once again more powerful than books. If you've seen the "night to remember" video that's pretty much how any contract in the books go. Maybe a sign or two and a potion for difficult foes. And he hardly uses signs in the saga.
And in my opinion Triss is pretty spot on with the books. Her and Yen were good friends and she gets with Geralt during one of their "breaks". Triss is sweet, but firm and clever exactly what I get from her in game. But I may have painted book Triss that way based on me playing witcher 1 and 2 before reading the books.
Short version:
I read the books after playing Witcher 1 and 2 and found Geralt less powerful than in game, he used signs way less in the books, and Triss acts pretty much like Triss.
It would be neat to see the authors version but he's made it pretty clear he's not too interested in video games. Also the OP was trying to keep off the topic what we want in an expansion, instead thinking on is it a possibility.
Last edited:


