In no world does 1x1 grid supersampling do anything,that's literally the resolution you're using. 2 makes it 2x2(4K in case of 1080p native) and higher values make it even higher.
I missed that part of the stream, so it wasn't really full ultra after all huh. Looks like no need to play with ini's for sharpening then. Still here is to hoping LOD can be somehow increased despite being locked in the assets.No it was not.
You can see the graphical settings yourself below
No, in nvidia control panel, go into the Witcher profile and change it from Global to 16x.
View attachment 14034
You can tell from this image that AF is working.
Attachments
Last edited:
The option to turn AA only "on or off" really bothers me.
Last edited:
Can you please tell me, what makes you think so? I I did not notice any HBAO+ things in config.
where? look at in-game graphic settings No mention about HBAO+
Ambient Occlusion: None/SSAO/HBAO
So.. its still HBAO+, even if it named HBAO in game\config?
Last edited:
Well, there are the obvious reasons of course - we already know it's confirmed, barely anyone uses the original HBAO/HDAO anymore when HBAO+ is available, which is much better etc etc etc whatever
But the matter of FACT is, this file is present in the folder:
GFSDK_SSAO.win64.dll
This is the the DLL dependency used by HBAO+ and nothing else.
Yes.
Last edited:
I don't think it is View attachment 14071
Only three options, none,SSAO,HBAO.
But can't we enable this trough the control panel?
Attachments
The code/library is HBAO+, they just called it "HBAO" in the game's options. It's like how some games don't mention "HBAO+" and just "Highest" AO Quality.
Let's not dwell on that, the proof library is in the game's files you can look for yourself GFSDK_SSAO.win64.dll
GFSDK is the prefix Nvidia uses for their libraries, probably stands for Geforce SDK or something like that.
Let's not dwell on that, the proof library is in the game's files you can look for yourself GFSDK_SSAO.win64.dll
GFSDK is the prefix Nvidia uses for their libraries, probably stands for Geforce SDK or something like that.
What bothers me most is the nondescript Antialiasing On/Off switch.
What kind of AA? SSAA? MSAA? TXAA? FXAA? SMAA?
What sample rate? 2x? 4x? 8x?
What kind of AA? SSAA? MSAA? TXAA? FXAA? SMAA?
What sample rate? 2x? 4x? 8x?
As I stated in another post, we have found a lot of AA options in the XML/ini
The Off/On is in the PostProcess section meaning it's for Post-Process AA. Maybe they didn't add these to the Options menu in the build that they showed because the retail version which we have(preload) has all these options.
@sidspyker:
Thanks!
That would be wonderful if all these options were in the game menu to select freely. But if editing the .ini's and .xml's is what we'll be the only way - oh, well, better that then no way at all, no?
I still think to date Far Cry 4 had the wealthiest range of options as far as AA goes...
That degree of customization would be greatly appreciated in TW3!
sidspyker , quote: "AllowAntialias=false //Post-AA, likely FXAA or SMAA... small chance of MLAA"
I'd say it's fairly certain that it's not MLAA (AMD's AA solution), as Nvidia is the one partially funding the game.
Thanks!
That would be wonderful if all these options were in the game menu to select freely. But if editing the .ini's and .xml's is what we'll be the only way - oh, well, better that then no way at all, no?
I still think to date Far Cry 4 had the wealthiest range of options as far as AA goes...
That degree of customization would be greatly appreciated in TW3!
sidspyker , quote: "AllowAntialias=false //Post-AA, likely FXAA or SMAA... small chance of MLAA"
I'd say it's fairly certain that it's not MLAA (AMD's AA solution), as Nvidia is the one partially funding the game.
Last edited:
Yeah, I'd also to see some comparison screenshots the minute the game is unlocked, so I don't have to fiddle with it to make up my mind
Also, there is a slight clash in the functionality of sharpening and post-process AA (it it's FXAA), as that AA method blurs the screen quite a bit. So, sharpening is in the options to compensate for that? - That would mean that a user who wants the harsher sharpened look of the game image would need to not use that post-process AA and use MSAA or whatever other non-post-process AA they have implemented in the game.
It's also highly unlikely for the fact that SMAA is the successor, so to speak, to MLAA.
SMAA is highly based on MLAA, just without the noticeable drawbacks MLAA brings, since SMAA is sub-pixel based.
Possible, yes. That's how the sharpening slider in the nvidia driver for DSR works. But I wonder if we could even achive some over-sharpening effect with it, not only compensating for additional sharpening losses by downsampling or anti aliasing methods.Yeah, I'd also to see some comparison screenshots the minute the game is unlocked, so I don't have to fiddle with it to make up my mind
Also, there is a slight clash in the functionality of sharpening and post-process AA (it it's FXAA), as that AA method blurs the screen quite a bit. So, sharpening is in the options to compensate for that? - That would mean that a user who wants the harsher sharpened look of the game image would need to not use that post-process AA and use MSAA or whatever other non-post-process AA they have implemented in the game.
I personally think that SMAA is hands-down the best AA when purely looking at the performance to quality ratio.
But somehow I can't shake the feeling that the post-AA solution they implemented in the game is FXAA. Just because, again, it's Nvidia's funding.
Hoping for SMAA. Only problem is - how can anyone tell for sure which one it is without the devs explicitly telling us?
But, even if that's the case - I'll just use Inject_SMAA or SweetFX and problem solved...
Edit: Whoops - seems SweetFX does not work with 64-bit games... And TW3 is only 64-bit judging by the executable in the game files....
But somehow I can't shake the feeling that the post-AA solution they implemented in the game is FXAA. Just because, again, it's Nvidia's funding.
Hoping for SMAA. Only problem is - how can anyone tell for sure which one it is without the devs explicitly telling us?
But, even if that's the case - I'll just use Inject_SMAA or SweetFX and problem solved...
Edit: Whoops - seems SweetFX does not work with 64-bit games... And TW3 is only 64-bit judging by the executable in the game files....
Last edited: