AMA with Paweł Burza - discussion

+
AkvQQ;n10679411 said:
Actually it should be called AMCQ (Ask me a convenient question) rather than AMA (Ask me anything).

Both of my questions remain unanswered:



I have a feeling that CDPR doesn't like to talk about this topics.

You do realise that they aren't obliged to answer every single question you ask, right? Burza answered tons of questions that a lot of companies wouldn't touch. Compare to the pathetic AMA that EA pulled for Battlefront 2, where they ignored every tough question to put on a good face.

They've been relatively upfront about their mentality about card balance; they look most at cards that aren't seeing play, because they'd like the majority of cards to be useable to someone, somewhere in the game.
 
4RM3D;n10679461 said:
First of all, you'll have to understand that Burza could not answer all questions.


Nice try man. Now you know why they didn't answear it.

1) Less avatars as rewards and no new avatars
2) No balance patches
 
With new Project Director this game began to disappoint its community. Do we have a chance that Rethaz will return?
 
ZenaRose;n10748551 said:
With new Project Director this game began to disappoint its community. Do we have a chance that Rethaz will return?

Why is that? Rethaz was responsible for the midwinter update, gwent's worst update of all time and other stupid changes like making every unit agile. If there is anybody I miss it's Damien Monnier.
 
Making every unit agile was a good change imo, there is no good reason for them not to be agile. Giving cards abilities based on what row they are on however would give rows purpose. I don't want to be forced to play on certain rows for no other reason than to line up things for my opposition.
 
Top Bottom