Forums
Games
Cyberpunk 2077 Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales GWENT®: The Witcher Card Game The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings The Witcher The Witcher Adventure Game
Jobs Store Support Log in Register
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
Menu
Forums - CD PROJEKT RED
  • Hot Topics
  • NEWS
  • GENERAL
    THE WITCHER ADVENTURE GAME
  • STORY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 THE WITCHER TALES
  • GAMEPLAY
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 THE WITCHER 3 MODS (THE WITCHER) MODS (THE WITCHER 2) MODS (THE WITCHER 3)
  • TECHNICAL
    THE WITCHER THE WITCHER 2 (PC) THE WITCHER 2 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (PC) THE WITCHER 3 (PLAYSTATION) THE WITCHER 3 (XBOX) THE WITCHER 3 (SWITCH)
  • COMMUNITY
    FAN ART (THE WITCHER UNIVERSE) FAN ART (CYBERPUNK UNIVERSE) OTHER GAMES
  • RED Tracker
    The Witcher Series Cyberpunk GWENT
Menu

Register

Announcing Gwent and bolstering Xbox One Collector’s Edition of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

+
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • …

    Go to page

  • 82
Next
First Prev 63 of 82

Go to page

Next Last
S

ShenGAME

Rookie
#1,241
Aug 17, 2014
Tommy said:
Huh ? The game will be the same across all platforms . The only thing being discussed here is the physical content ie the addition of a cloth map and a deck of cards in the collector`s editions .
Click to expand...
Exactly this. Could people now please calm down? The major parts of the CE are also the same across the platforms -and- the game stays the same no matter what edition you are going to buy.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: jerf.674 and AutumnalWanderer
W

Warlegend

Rookie
#1,242
Aug 17, 2014
Maybe we can finally start talking about gwent in the game itself. ^^ I'm pretty curious how the card collecting will be implemented.

Pretty excited for this feature, as it reminds me of my Pokemon-Card "Addiction" or other collecting-madness in childhood :D
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: jerf.674
W

Whispers_of_Winter

Rookie
#1,243
Aug 17, 2014
First I'd like to say that the most important content of any edition is the game itself.
But to be honest the ONLY reason I didn't pre-order a physical collector's edition for PC was the lack of cards (even before they announced there would be some in the XBox CE).

EDIT: Well, just ordered the CE for PC to show my support for the only bigger company left which give their heart to make great games.
 
Last edited: Aug 18, 2014
R

Reod

Rookie
#1,244
Aug 17, 2014
WhispersofWinter said:
First I'd like to say that the most important content of any edition is the game itself.
But to be honest the ONLY reason I didn't pre-order a physical collector's edition for PC was the lack of cards (even before they announced there would be some in the XBox CE).
Click to expand...
When pre-orders went up there wasnt info about cards.And then PC CE's sold out pretty fast.
And you didnt pre-order cos there wasnt any cards in time when THERE WASNT ANY CARDS or any info about them...

???
 
W

Whispers_of_Winter

Rookie
#1,245
Aug 17, 2014
That's what I said, so I don't understand your point. I collect cards in RL and TW II had a card deck, so I bought the CE additional to the digital edition. W III had no cards (for PC CE) so I didn't buy the CE. That has nothing to do with the XBox CE now. Just saying if the PC CE had / has cards, I'd buy it. I only pre-ordered the digital edition several weeks ago.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
R

Reod

Rookie
#1,246
Aug 17, 2014
WhispersofWinter said:
That's what I said, so I don't understand your point. I collect cards in RL and TW II had a card deck, so I bought the CE additional to the digital edition. W III had no cards (for PC CE) so I didn't buy the CE.
Click to expand...
Ok now i understand(I collected MtG while back) .But its kinda diffrent situation because if MS didnt pay/order those deck we would not see them in any CE anyway and you wouldnt buy CE right?

And in that way you now have slight chance getting them other way.But i would wait because i think if that card game will become popular ingame feature they will realese it as a CGI , so as a ingame feature it can work as testing grounds.But thats my thoughts.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
H

Halbaron

Rookie
#1,247
Aug 17, 2014
jerf said:
I pre-ordered a PC collector's edition (and a GOG edition on top of that), and, of course, I'm a bit disappointed that I won't be getting these extra two physical decks of cards and the cloth map.

However, you guys are blowing this way out of proportion.

First of all, Marcin Iwinski's words about no exclusive content were taken out of context. What he said was that the game won't have any exclusive content on any platform. This still holds. After that he said that they will do something in terms of marketing cooperation. Now clearly Xbox 1 edition of CE was selling much worse than all other CE editions, and, on Microsoft's request, CDPR had to try to do something to fix that, to oay Microsoft back for the publicity gains due to the presence on Microsoft's stage during the E3's. And trying to solve this problem with some exclusive physical content (when there already were some precedents of exclusive physical contents provided by some retailers) is, in my opinion, the best way to do it.

All these talks of CDPR losing all trust and becoming the new EA or Ubisoft, are, frankly, gross exaggerations. Adding two trinkets to one CE is a much lesser sin than cutting substantial chunks of game content out of the game and selling it separately/providing it exclusively on some platforms. So, please, stop these comparisons, they are way out of proportions.

Now to address people who are saying that they "are not getting the full contents of the collector's edition for $150". Why didn't you feel the same when some retailers started providing exclusive additions, like Amazon.de did? If you're not living in or close to Germany you can't get the exclusive comic book, why didn't you feel cheated by that, that you're not getting the "complete" collector's edition? Also, when you made your CE preorder, you knew what it will have inside, and you will be getting the full contents that were promised. Why are you so jealous of some people getting a few things on top, for which the owner of their platform of choice paid? This is a bit childish, frankly. And if you want these decks and the cloth map so badly, you can always buy them later on ebay, or just order the Xbone collector's edition and then swap the actual disk of the game with the version you need.

There are a lot of people saying that they know for sure that this step from CDPR shows that they will soon end up where Bioware and the likes did, that they have seen this path countless times, and with certainity even if CDPR is not that bad now, they will start spawning paid DLC and platform-exlusive game content quite soon. Now, this is a very weak logic. All these "countless times" happened when some developer (like Bioware) was bought out by some giant company (like EA). This is not what's happening. In our case, CDPR needed some publicity. A lot of people discovered The Witcher 3 due to CDPR's presence at Microsoft's stage at the last two E3's. For this CDPR needs to pay Microsoft back with something. And adding few trinkets to Xbone CE is the least evil way to do this, as I argued above. Microsoft didn't _buy_ CDPR, it's just marketing cooperation. CDPR isn't going to start sliding downhill like Bioware did. CDPR is still a small independent company, with high values. But they had to make this compromise between their high values and the publicity they needed. This doesn't mean that they will start becoming worse and worse soon (or ever). If The Witcher 3 sells well (which is very probable), they will get enough money to be able to avoid any such compromises. Remember, they almost went bankrupt two times (after the release of the first game and after the release of the second game).

To conclude, please, have some faith in CDPR and stop being so jealous. This is coming from a person who preordered a PC collector's edition.
Click to expand...
I totally respect the argument that because of the long and difficult process of making the last chapter of an epic series - and going as far as I know the first time Open World, too, what can be difficult - CD Projekt needed to get financial support. It's logical, we live in a world where concurrence is hard.
What I think, is that the time for announcing such a cooperation is just very difficult. As I said somewhere above, bringing this to publicity just a few days after the announcement of this XBOX-exclusive edition of Tomb Raider made some people worry.
Well, of course nothing is for free and of course it's part of a Microsoft strategy to show their strength by announcing exclusive editions in a short term, but I'm simply not sure if it is even the best for CD Projekt. It was obvious that there would be discussions about it, especially after such a short term.

Furthermore, I don't like the argument with the special offers. They simply do not belong to the Collectors Edition. But I understand, what you want to say: Sometimes you have to give something up to get something in reward. I'm still not sure if one can compare such offers with adding new things to the CE only for Microsoft, but I see your point and - as I stated above - I respect, what you want to say.

The only thing I would like to ask you, is to respect the people, who are worried, too. It's not all black and white and not all the people, who criticize this step only want to spam. I feel somehow attacked, sorry to say this. It's more that - I can only speak for myself, of course - some people maybe care so much about CD Projekt and what they stand for - for not trying to earn more money by selling more DLCs, as you said - that they worry about what this step might mean for the future of CD Projekt. It's an important step to cooperate with Microsoft and of course not only CD Projekt will get benefits by this. I think we can only wait, what it will mean for the future.

This is what I wanted to show, when I said that it's not only about a few cards. It's maybe - only maybe! - about the further way of the studio.
And to make it clear: Of course I don't want CD Projekt to end just like BioWare and I don't see it now to happen.
I only fear what will happen, when CD Projekt is - with the help of Microsoft - as succesful as you say. As I already said: We have to wait.

EDIT: To be totally honest, it's simply somehow frustrating to see that even CD Projekt needs to give up a piece - may it be big or small - of its independence, because they need financial support. This shows me that we don't live in Utopia. Maybe it's somehow naive to think that CD Projekt could stay completely independent forever, but I liked the thought.

Second Edit: Yeah, I think, that's, what it is basically about. Frustration. Disappointment not about CD Projekt in particular, but about how the gaming industry works in common. Maybe we understand each other better now.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
  • RED Point
Reactions: LynetteC, jerf.674 and ummid
W

Whispers_of_Winter

Rookie
#1,248
Aug 17, 2014
@ Reod: As I said in my edited post, this has nothing to do with the current announcement. It's just a general statement of mine. I prefer digital editions in general. But for a card deck which can't be bought seperately I'd buy the CE.

EDIT: @ Reod: This may be illogical, but I wouldn't buy the XBox CE for the cards, only the PC CE, since that's my only gaming platform. I'd like to see CDPR selling those cards separately one day, but I'm pretty sure this won't happen, since all the XBox CE buyers would complain about their loss of exclusivity then.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
F

Fuz.702

Senior user
#1,249
Aug 17, 2014
Tommy said:
Huh ? The game will be the same across all platforms . The only thing being discussed here is the physical content ie the addition of a cloth map and a deck of cards in the collector`s editions .
Click to expand...
A collector's edition is all about physical content. A person who is willing to pay more than the double price of the game for collector's items has every right to feel pissed.
Of course people who weren't interested in the CE in the first place are fine with it.

The meaning of the word "content" is not even a debate:

content
[kon-tent]
noun
1.
Usually, contents.
something that is contained:
the contents of a box.

It's basic english.

You may be fine with it, ok, I get it. But this it's absolutely NOT treating "all gamers equally", no matter how much you try to twist the words - lawyer-y style - to give them another meaning.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
  • RED Point
Reactions: SpeeX97 and Holgar82
A

AutumnalWanderer

Forum veteran
#1,250
Aug 17, 2014
fuz said:
A collector's edition is all about physical content. A person who is willing to pay more than the double price of the game for collector's items has every right to feel pissed.
Of course people who weren't interested in the CE in the first place are fine with it.

The meaning of the word "content" is not even a debate:

content
[kon-tent]
noun
1.
Usually, contents.
something that is contained:
the contents of a box.

It's basic english.

You may be fine with it, ok, I get it. But this it's absolutely NOT treating "all gamers equally", no matter how much you try to twist the words - lawyer-y style - to give them another meaning.
Click to expand...
Did you know that the first Witcher has at least 3 kind of different CE at that time? Probably was more, I can't remember. To be honest with you, when I saw the polish edition I was jealous. The Hungarian edition was nothing to that at all, I was jealous the Xbox 360 CE as well back in time because the medallion. But saying that the CDPR like Bioware and starting petitions is unfair and disrespectful. They are not deserv this, because the PC/PS4 CE is still rich as hell. The game will be kick ass as well. But saying that this company will support better the X1 is not true at all. The PC gamers will have modding tool, the GOG digital version not just cheaper than the Steam version, but also richer, not to mention that the game will be the SAME on every platform.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: wichat and jerf.674
F

Fuz.702

Senior user
#1,251
Aug 17, 2014
Autumnal Wanderer said:
Did you know that the first Witcher has at least 3 kind of different CE at that time? Probably was more, I can't remember. To be honest with you, when I saw the polish edition I was jealous.
Click to expand...
Same, and I looked for a long time to buy it somewhere, but it was insanely expensive everywhere ("buy the cards for cheap on ebay!!1!" yeah, right).

But it's a totally different matter.
It was a starting company, they had it from the start and they never said they were treating everyone equally and they did not pictured themselves so heavily pro-consumer.
 
B

BenWylde

Forum regular
#1,252
Aug 17, 2014
So much for Microsoft's "renewed focus" on Windows PC gaming earlier this year ...

I must say, it's quite a mess with exclusives lately, but I haven't expected something like this. I mean, it's a COLLECTOR'S Edition, cutting or adding things on different platforms sounds plain bad, even when I can understand the deal (even when MS is lying about gaming on PC all the time). But I still think, it would be better in the PC's CE because the game grow up on this platform, but that's not up to me to decide such things. I could understand if things are different in the standard edition, but Collector's Editions ... they're unique and limited, that's another story. I think CDPR should think this over and look for another way ...

Oh and on a side note about the various extras on different sites/services (like GOG, Steam, etc) - I'd find it quite hard to decide where to get the game as I'd like to get possibly every bonus thing as a fan. I kinda dislike that everyone has different bonus stuff and up their sleeves to get people into buying the game. And now the CE disaster ... Nope I'm not getting a console just for the cards and the better map.

Maybe we get those exclusive extras later via merchandise stuff, but I highly doubt that ...
 
A

AutumnalWanderer

Forum veteran
#1,253
Aug 17, 2014
fuz said:
Same, and I looked for a long time to buy it somewhere, but it was insanely expensive everywhere ("buy the cards for cheap on ebay!!1!" yeah, right).

But it's a totally different matter.
It was a starting company, they had it from the start and they never said they were treating everyone equally and they did not pictured themselves so heavily pro-consumer.
Click to expand...
You will ba able to buy some witcher stuff directly from CDPR when the shop will be avaible. Just saying.
 
F

Fuz.702

Senior user
#1,254
Aug 17, 2014
Autumnal Wanderer said:
You will ba able to buy some witcher stuff directly from CDPR when the shop will be avaible. Just saying.
Click to expand...
And that will be pretty cool (well, except for my wallet). I want a mug too.
But it doesn't cancel the fact that we're paying the same price as xbone CD and getting less... and we MAY be able to pay even more to get those items.
 
tommy5761

tommy5761

Mentor
#1,255
Aug 17, 2014
fuz said:
A collector's edition is all about physical content. A person who is willing to pay more than the double price of the game for collector's items has every right to feel pissed.
Of course people who weren't interested in the CE in the first place are fine with it.

The meaning of the word "content" is not even a debate:

content
[kon-tent]
noun
1.
Usually, contents.
something that is contained:
the contents of a box.

It's basic english.

You may be fine with it, ok, I get it. But this it's absolutely NOT treating "all gamers equally", no matter how much you try to twist the words - lawyer-y style - to give them another meaning.
Click to expand...
I think I know what content is and means . Thank you for the explanation though . Why should anyone feel pissed as when you had the chance to order the CE the contents were listed as to what you would be getting . You can say "treating all gamers" the same all you want but to me it`s petty jealousy . Nothing more and nothing less .
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: wichat
J

jerf.674

Forum veteran
#1,256
Aug 17, 2014
Halbaron said:
I totally respect the argument that because of the long and difficult process of making the last chapter of an epic series - and going as far as I know the first time Open World, too, what can be difficult - CD Projekt needed to get financial support. It's logical, we live in a world where concurrence is hard.
What I think, is that the time for announcing such a cooperation is just very difficult. As I said somewhere above, bringing this to publicity just a few days after the announcement of this XBOX-exclusive edition of Tomb Raider made some people worry.
Well, of course nothing is for free and of course it's part of a Microsoft strategy to show their strength by announcing exclusive editions in a short term, but I'm simply not sure if it is even the best for CD Projekt. It was obvious that there would be discussions about it, especially after such a short term.

Furthermore, I don't like the argument with the special offers. They simply do not belong to the Collectors Edition. But I understand, what you want to say: Sometimes you have to give something up to get something in reward. I'm still not sure if one can compare such offers with adding new things to the CE only for Microsoft, but I see your point and - as I stated above - I respect, what you want to say.

The only thing I would like to ask you, is to respect the people, who are worried, too. It's not all black and white and not all the people, who criticize this step only want to spam. I feel somehow attacked, sorry to say this. It's more that - I can only speak for myself, of course - some people maybe care so much about CD Projekt and what they stand for - for not trying to earn more money by selling more DLCs, as you said - that they worry about what this step might mean for the future of CD Projekt. It's an important step to cooperate with Microsoft and of course not only CD Projekt will get benefits by this. I think we can only wait, what it will mean for the future.

This is what I wanted to show, when I said that it's not only about a few cards. It's maybe - only maybe! - about the further way of the studio.
And to make it clear: Of course I don't want to end CD Projekt just like BioWare and I don't see it now to happen.
I only fear what will happen, when CD Projekt is - with the help of Microsoft - as succesful as you say. As I already said: We have to wait.

EDIT: To be totally honest, it's simply somehow frustrating to see that even CD Projekt needs to give up a piece - may it be big or small - of its independence, because they need financial support. This shows me that we don't live in Utopia. Maybe it's somehow naive to think that CD Projekt could stay completely independent forever, but I liked the thought.

Second Edit: Yeah, I think, that's, what it is basically about. Frustration. Disappointment not about CD Projekt in particular, but about how the gaming industry works in common. Maybe we understand each other now better.
Click to expand...
Sorry if my post made you feel attacked. Of course, I fear that CDPR might go the wrong way too, and clearly showing them that we wouldn't appreciate this is necessary.

However, the current situation doesn't seem to be a sure sign of CDPR becoming the next Bioware, as many people in this thread implied. My post was mainly addressed to them. Many of them went way too far in their statements, although I understand that it happened mostly because of raw emotions.

I share your frustration on how the gaming industry currently works. I think that we understand each other better now too.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: wichat, Halbaron and SpeeX97
L

Lamaboi

Rookie
#1,257
Aug 17, 2014
It baffles me how well-adjusted people can have such knee-jerk reactions over something so small.
I could understand all this disappointment if CDPR decided to make exclusive DLC's or delay one platform release over the other. Starting petitions and boycotting because someones platform of choice won't be getting an extra physical bonus or two seems just incredibly childish and ungrateful considering how well CDPR is treating us gamers by keeping parity across all platforms. Nothing has changed, they didn't break their promise becuase they're gonna allow everyone to play the same game regardless of the purchased edition, and this is true gamer equality.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: HarelMor, AutumnalWanderer and wichat
F

Fuz.702

Senior user
#1,258
Aug 17, 2014
Tommy said:
but to me it`s petty jealousy . Nothing more and nothing less .
Click to expand...
No, it's a collector's completionism.
I would also be grateful if you didn't make such personal attacks. You're also a mod, you should try to be civil.
 
  • RED Point
Reactions: SpeeX97 and Elegast7
H

Halbaron

Rookie
#1,259
Aug 17, 2014
jerf said:
Sorry if my post made you feel attacked. Of course, I fear that CDPR might go the wrong way too, and clearly showing them that we wouldn't appreciate this is necessary.

However, the current situation doesn't seem to be a sure sign of CDPR becoming the next Bioware, as many people in this thread implied. My post was mainly addressed to them. Many of them went way too far in their statements, although I understand that it happened mostly because of raw emotions.

I share your frustration on how the gaming industry currently works. I think that we understand each other better now too.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the explanation. Of course I`m even not with the people writing "f*ck this game" now. This is not a level at which the discussion should move.
@Lambot

I guess the discussion about breaking promises etc. is mainly about the definition of "content". Does "content" mean "ingame only" or is content everything the CE...well, contents?
 
B

BenWylde

Forum regular
#1,260
Aug 17, 2014
fuz said:
No, it's a collector's completionism.
Click to expand...
Pretty much this. If you collected every previous CE so far and want to get the next one as well and hear "oh dang, it's NOT complete" ... that's such a bad feeling, even when it's just small stuff like the cards.

And later at release comes a console guy around the corner with his CE and just mocks the PC CE owners "haha, I've got the one with more value console rocks" ... oh boy, I can imagine that so well.

Halbaron said:
I guess the discussion about breaking promises etc. is mainly about the definition of "content". Does "content" mean "ingame only" or is content everything the CE...well, contents?
Click to expand...
You pretty much hit the nail here.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • …

    Go to page

  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • …

    Go to page

  • 82
Next
First Prev 63 of 82

Go to page

Next Last
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link
  • English
    English Polski (Polish) Deutsch (German) Русский (Russian) Français (French) Português brasileiro (Brazilian Portuguese) Italiano (Italian) 日本語 (Japanese) Español (Spanish)

STAY CONNECTED

Facebook Twitter YouTube
CDProjekt RED Mature 17+
  • Contact administration
  • User agreement
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Press Center
© 2018 CD PROJEKT S.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

The Witcher® is a trademark of CD PROJEKT S. A. The Witcher game © CD PROJEKT S. A. All rights reserved. The Witcher game is based on the prose of Andrzej Sapkowski. All other copyrights and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Forum software by XenForo® © 2010-2020 XenForo Ltd.