As I posted before absolutely nothing, it effects all markets not just western...What has all of that to do with "western"?
As I posted before absolutely nothing, it effects all markets not just western...What has all of that to do with "western"?
Seriously, this. Ljesnjanin have a right idea
Very wierd... that means he stops thinking of FrXXXXXX of VXXX for a moment!
The characters and world are based on the books, but the STORY is written by CDPR.CD Projekt Red wrote no story at all, the Witcher isn't their IP.
A game/book/whatever does not NEED to be dark/edgy/mature to be good. Star Wars and Lord of the Rings are quite the opposite of TW but they are by no means bad stories. Now when any kind of media has the pretense of being mature but the writers are too timid to tackle the issue or don't have the experience then we do have a problem.This whole mentioned in the topic think is about sales, for sure but CS Projekt is planning to create their world as real as they can. Stuff like swearing and sex, they may be mature, but they are also natural, which is the key. Also, about story, quests and such stuff, The Witcher requires attention and it's very complex in many aspects. You can play many games almost mindlessly, which serves well, when it comes to children, or casuals, dont think, just play, enjoy the gameplay. I love that.
I prefer to create my own character , but W2 is my favourite game to date. Its not about taste, its about quality. I really want a good TES game. Open world and ability to choose your race(which changes nothing except looks and one skill btw) is not an excuse to have poor writing, bad combat, repetitive generic quests, like 5 voice actors for the whole game, world that completely ignores what you have done, boring rpg mechanics etc etc etc. For a company that has budget, time and experience...not very impressive. I dont care about main storyline in TES. Remove it. Just give me at least some motivation to explore and try different characters."Based on" is the same as not wrote and just semantics, imn my opinion.
The point I'm making they adapted an existing story and characters with complete and detailed back stories and used those exact same characters in the game, but don't think I'm condemning them for doing it that way. I'm just emphasising, it's a completely different method to what Bethesda did, which is basically sketch a very basic story for the player to flesh out, with lots of world lore not directly related to your character.
They are two different techniques and not really comparable in the way the OP attempts.
Also just because, I prefer to play a character I create with my own back stoiy and develop my story as the game evolves, doesn't mean I can't appreciate the alternative method CD Projekt Red have used.
It's just a preference, not a red line, I will not cross..
Maybe it's a language difference, but the story in TW3 is original, and written by CDPR. It is NOT an adaptation of an existing story. Yes, the characters and back stories come from the books, but saying that they didn't write the story isn't just about semantics, it's a total misrepresentation of fact."Based on" is the same as not wrote and just semantics, imn my opinion.
The point I'm making they adapted an existing story and characters...
That is what I was about to reply withThe characters and world are based on the books, but the STORY is written by CDPR.