I've never understood why people dress up their dogs/cats/bunnies/horses/fish. Not only does it look ridiculous but I also doubt the animals particularly like it.
I'll observe that, traditionally, many humans have shown a tendency to enjoy projecting their human behaviours and characteristics on non-human entities, for a variety of reasons and purposes. Folklore, art, and mythology are filled with examples, some more meaningful than others. Basically, though, I believe the practice tells us more about the humans themselves, and, in most cases, the animals are mere vehicles of expression for 'human' images or thoughts.
However, dressing a horse up as a rabbit-fish. . . now, that might be a wee bit unusual. (I'll leave it to someone else to find a suitable example from the Internet.)
How does one go about dressing fish, though? They're quite slippery and won't stand still long enough to get their measurements.
Naturally, one must take rather fluid measurements, and then scale for an approximate fit. If all else fails, just slip on any old thing. Fish don't seem to be especially picky when it comes to fashion.
The website is telling me that:
"Hi BartonFink! Welcome on forums! As a new user you can only create new threads in TECHNICAL rooms. Once you reach 10 posts, you will be able to create new threads freely across the entire board except in NEWS rooms".
My account tells me that I have 10 messages here. If that is something different to a "post" then that just sort of seems like you have to spam threads to reach 10. If this website didn't have this requirement, then I'd just post my game related questions without having to deal with all of this hassle.
"Hi BartonFink! Welcome on forums! As a new user you can only create new threads in TECHNICAL rooms. Once you reach 10 posts, you will be able to create new threads freely across the entire board except in NEWS rooms".
My account tells me that I have 10 messages here. If that is something different to a "post" then that just sort of seems like you have to spam threads to reach 10. If this website didn't have this requirement, then I'd just post my game related questions without having to deal with all of this hassle.
It's not. But it may take the system a while to recognize you've 10 posts, especially if posting in quick succession.
(Post moved to one of our off-topic threads.)
That's so cool! Thank you Moors- to have made me know.
I will try that... I mean, I know I don't have many chance, but that's not a reason to stop!
Have a good evening, and see you next!
Hmph. For as much as those dismal movies followed the books, I'm surprised Jackson didn't portray their weapons thus from the start.
Whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!?!?!?!?!?! @Riven-Twain doesn't like Lord of the Rings?!?!?!? We need to talk about this Riven. The Hobbit Trilogy I 100% understand ... but The Lord of the Rings?
That horse picture that @DoubleDealer posted is a familiar one, though the last time I saw it I completely failed to see the "text" until it was pointed out to me.
I loved those movies. They're weren't as good as the books ... but I only know of one movie I like better than the book it's based on. So that's not atypical.All I remember from those are HUGE battles (which got old) and who I'm sure was Gandalf riding down stairs on that magnificent white stallion on his (the horse was one of my favourite parts of the movies). Oh, and the iconic "You shall not pass!" but only because it's so popular.
Huh, it worked fine when I posted it -- but I know what happened. I was just dumb.
Here it is again: