I dunno... because boots are boots and they all look more or less the same?Oh and how could you not care for boots? Have you seen the alder folk boots? they're stunning! I just wish there was a compatible chest piece for it.
None, they all suck
Yeah. Even the shittiest armor of TW2 is more good-looking than any of those of TW3
Are you really, really sure?
Look at it like this. A set of armor that a monster slayer would wear VS a vest over a white tshirt.
A hard leather chest piece with a bag VS a thick cloth that has a leather upper chest and a skirt.
Need I remind you that the scabbards in TW2 were attached to Geralt and not hovering over his back like in TW3
Why the fuck would Geralt fight a rock troll wearing just a vest and a tshirt?? Judging by the fact that you use the Younger Geralt mod you probably don't care about lore-friendly aesthetics as much as I do but even mastercrafted versions of those armors are ridiculous. Take for instance the bear armor, wearing a skirt of chainmail and a tight linen scarf would only hinder somebody in a fight. Seriously, it's like the person designing Witcher sets had a retarded notion that adding chainmail to everything makes it "better".
Even the fucking Wolf school gear. You go from wearing a tshirt and a sleeveless jacket to wearing a fully chainmail jacket.
It's funny that you talk about lore-appropriate gear, because in the books, it's exactly jackets and jerkins that Geralt wears, not the over-designed armours of TW2.
I can understand not liking the visual design of armours in 3, but they're miles more appropriate for Geralt when it comes to lore. His actual "armour" are his reflexes, not his gear.
Anyway, personally, I like the Wolven and Griffin sets.
Jackets and jerkins, not lengthy chainmail dresses or a BDSM chin-high collared skivvy. Those armors in the screenshots are also top tier so it would make sense that they have a bunch of layers, as if they were crafted from various things.
Fact is, though, you were referring to specifically the cat armour that lacks any of the chainmail etc. and comparing them to armours in TW2 that are very much overdesigned, claiming the latter example was more lore-appropriate.
Are you really comparing a white shirt with the badass Vran Armor? Yeah, i'm damn sure. Even Eskel and Lambert agree with me, because they are wearing TW2 armors.Are you really, really sure?
Again, lore-wise, TW2 armours make as little sense as the full plates from TW3. It's just that TW3 also offers lore-friendly ones, which was my point. You can't use lore as an argument to promote armours from TW2 over, say, low tier cat/bear/wolf armour. Aesthetically? Sure, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Personally, I think TW1 has the best armour - both in terms of looks and lore-friendliness.
Again, lore-wise, TW2 armours make as little sense as the full plates from TW3.... You can't use lore as an argument to promote armours from TW2
Personally, I think TW1 has the best armour - both in terms of looks and lore-friendliness.
Any tier of TW2 is more lorefriendly than most of the TW3 armors though. Sure, no descriptions of Geralt wearing a jacket made out of layers upon layers of scrapped together leather and rune ribbons but at least it's still a jacket. The books never make mention of Geralt wearing a tshirt under a vest or a studded skivvy that goes up to his chin.
Of course TW1 had better armor in terms of lore cus it was simplistic and effective which is predominantly what Witcher armor should be. Geralt wearing a studded doublet VS a half chainmail, half thick cloth kilt onesie thing with a scarf. But Witcher 2 was much closer to the books than Witcher 3.
In a way though, none of the armor in TW3 is Geralts. It's crafted from diagrams made by other witcher schools or shit thats pulled from a Kaedweni armorer's underpants. The Witcher 2's was like "If I scrap together a bunch of random shit I could craft something comfortable and effective" rather than "Holy potatoes Vesemir, I found a bible from the Cat school that says I should make a skivvy covered in acne-studs."
I didn't say that TW2 are lore-friendly, i said that many TW3 armors are totally lore-unfriendly. And because of that the TW2 armors are much better in therms of lore/aesthetics. You can't really compare these in two, i mean some plate on the shoulder? Good, like the Mastercrafted Bear armor, but an entire breastplate? :hurt:
Of course, they're only two armors with different variation of textures. ( Don't get me wrong, i like them)
Look, I see your point, but simultaneously:
Anyway, yeah, I don't think TW3's armours are perfect, but I do think the simpler design overall is closer to what Geralt would wear than what we see in TW2. besides, if chainmail is such an issue, then you'll be sad to learn that a considerable amount of armours in TW2 also have chainmail.
Was mostly replying to Darkstar there
But yeah, heavy armour is TW3 is beyond me. Give him a lance, why don't you. And a crossbo-- o wait. Ahem, but that's off-topic
Yea we're on the same page but I prefer reindeer shoulders over bulbous fatty knight