Better cpu or gpu for W3?

[alextyc1]

Yeah,I remember how two years ago everyone were going nuts becsuse bf3, like:
"youll need 4 sli gtx 580 to at least run battlefield 3 on max settings!!"

I dont know about ultra for gtx 660,but high settings for sure.

 

[mai3r]

I dont know about ultra for gtx 660,but high settings for sure.

Who need to run it at ultra? I'm waiting for the story and characters, not the graphics.

 

[M4xw0lf.978]

Who need to run it at ultra? I'm waiting for the story and characters, not the graphics. />

Yeah, but who doesn't like their story and characters presented in stunning visuals? ^^

 

[alextyc1]

Who need to run it at ultra? I'm waiting for the story and characters, not the graphics. />

I just gave you my opinion on what settings you could play...
I wait for the story and characters more too, but its also interesting how the game will look

 

[sblantipodi]

amd cores are not too good for gaming.
too many cores, too few powerful.

buy a good CPU with a GTX760 than add a second GTX760 when you have money.
imho this, is the best solution to your problem.

 

[alextyc1]

just found a Rdaeon R9 290X(650$) benchmark compared to

 

[Badasserish]

I guess gpu is much more important than cpu. wait till release date is released and check which graficcard you can buy. I would buy an radeon, because it's better to overclock than geforce.

 

[username_2067131]

Yeah, but who doesn't like their story and characters presented in stunning visuals? ^^

Dragon Age Origins also had outdated graphics and was a great success.
Skyrim without mods doesn't have the best look and yet it is I think the most sold RPG in the last years.

 

[alextyc1]

Dragon Age Origins also had outdated graphics and was a great success.
Skyrim without mods doesn't have the best look and yet it is I think the most sold RPG in the last years.

Well dragon age origins was great,and skyrim was...skyrimish.
But cdpr are not really "its good enough,leave it like that" dev and want everything to be top notch