Bleeding (5) or Bleeding "for 5 turns"? Same effect, two ways. Better just one.

[Etoclas]

Hi everyone,
as in the screenshot some cards have different ways of describing Bleeding abilities:

- give Bleeding (5);
- give Bleeding for 5 turns.

And the effect is the same.

So I think they should be rewritten in a single way.

What do you think about it?

 

[Draconifors]

There are tons of inconsistencies like this in the game's wordings. Which doesn't mean it's a good thing; would of course be better if everything was consistent.

 

[Etoclas]

There are tons of inconsistencies like this in the game's wordings. Which doesn't mean it's a good thing; would of course be better if everything was consistent.

Yeah, indeed my post was a feedback about a mistake.
I really hope they can make this good game better and better with players' feedbacks.

 

[Messyr]

Fully agreed. These can be at best annyoing if you are an experienced player, but at their worst can be quite misleading I presume for new players. Inconsistencies like these shouldn't exist.

 

[Etoclas]

Fully agreed. These can be at best annyoing if you are an experienced player, but at their worst can be quite misleading I presume for new players. Inconsistencies like these shouldn't exist.

I had problems at the beginning when reading this ability indeed.