I'm hopeful they understand they need to go further than that if they want to regain some semblance of goodwill.
- Status
I'm hopeful they understand they need to go further than that if they want to regain some semblance of goodwill.
Maybe an advice: try to stay clear from discussions and anything else and enjoy time more.
It may have to do with being in a spiral of negativity which lead to yous (and maybe others) lose of .. lets call it faith or whatever. Maybe at some point you started to dislike it not because you want to dislike it, but because you thought you needed to dislike it because "everyone" else does it?
Sorry for overstepping my boundaries. Still: I wish everyone a good day/evening.
I know, and you are right. I'm already trying to stay away from the forums as much as I can. But whenever I do check out new things I just get more and more dissapointed.Maybe an advice: try to stay clear from discussions and anything else and enjoy time more.
It may have to do with being in a spiral of negativity which lead to yous (and maybe others) lose of .. lets call it faith or whatever. Maybe at some point you started to dislike it not because you want to dislike it, but because you thought you needed to dislike it because "everyone" else does it?
Sorry for overstepping my boundaries. Still: I wish everyone a good day/evening.
I'm not hating on the game to be fair. It's just not the kind of game that I care for in it's current state. The game is okay for a shooter game, but I prefer RPGs.
I think that Jason Schreier' s ego had too much attention for today, close internet and read a book pals
Sorry. It's my opinion based on what I have seen so far and what officials stated. Since the next gen version does not come out until autumn 2021, they have a lot of time to look into the criticism brought up.
Nonetheless, I will still read the spoilers on payed dlcs, to see if this game will be worth additional time.
I would like to be pleasently surprised but my expectations are very low at this point.
That's all fine, maybe just come back again later after some patches and stuff and maybe you'll be able to enjoy it then. If not, then it might not have been the game for you, who knows? Either way taking a more relaxing and observing stance can be really good and open your mind.
That's saying that it's the players fault. Nice try.That's all fine, maybe just come back again later after some patches and stuff and maybe you'll be able to enjoy it then. If not, then it might not have been the game for you, who knows? Either way taking a more relaxing and observing stance can be really good and open your mind.
They SPENT months to build a demo to fk the world.
And they thought the game was running ok.
And they are so proud of the PC version now. The uncut enanched edition version?
Cyberpunk: the most accurate, calculated epic fraud of the decade.
And they thought the game was running ok.
And they are so proud of the PC version now. The uncut enanched edition version?
Cyberpunk: the most accurate, calculated epic fraud of the decade.
If you want to read it that way, go ahead. But I didn't really mean it like that. Just read what I wrote and you know what I mean.
Is it even explained whay does it mean by "fake"? I cannot read it all. Also developers leaving a company just because of the camera perspective of the game they are workign on sounds too strange to be real.
Lol you dont know Jason Schreier at all. Also, he mentioned numerous people from the INSIDE who stay Anonymous helped with that story. Playing the game, looking at the marketing videos. 1+1=2. its pretty clear what happened. Dont be so naive.
It means that it was specifically built for E3 with a month development that wasn't spent on the actual game. Also it says that the top devs had a specific vision on the gameplay for the game that didn't match with the head of the project.
why all the hate for Schreier? He's the only investigative gaming journalist we have and most of his in-depth articles so far have been spot on. I don't know the dude personally, but so far I would not call him malicious (and his chapter about the making of Witcher 3 in Blood, Sweat and Pixels is pretty positive).
There's a reason he is feared by publishers, because he mostly gets it right. Usually for articles like this, publishers/devs get at least 24h hours advance notice to comment on it before it is published. As mentioned in the article, CDPR decided not to comment on it. Which probably means nothing they could say would make it any better because the allegations are true.
I really hope he is going to dig up some information about the cut content.
There's a reason he is feared by publishers, because he mostly gets it right. Usually for articles like this, publishers/devs get at least 24h hours advance notice to comment on it before it is published. As mentioned in the article, CDPR decided not to comment on it. Which probably means nothing they could say would make it any better because the allegations are true.
I really hope he is going to dig up some information about the cut content.
He can have the ego of the universe for all I care. If he is credible as a journalist then that is all that matters in this context.
If you want to risk it you can risk it, but I ain't touching his tainted "Journalism" with a 10 foot pole.
- Status