Building a gaming PC

+
I don't plan to have such high resolution yet, so for me the benefit is simply using radeonsi, and then poking developers with bug reprots for games that don't work well on it for some reason ;)
 
Yup, as I thought it hits the mainstream (<$200) market quite well, bringing above GTX 970 performance to it (and sometimes coming close to 980 even, which is impressive). Definitely not an enthusiast card, but I believe this is a smart move from AMD to regain its market share, since according to steam charts %80 of the consumers use cards that cost <$200. As a - sort of - enthusiast myself, I'd wait for Vega. Not saying it'll most definitely be faster than 1080 or 1080 Ti (we will have to wait and see that), but considering the price gouging going for the Nvidia cards because of low supplies, it seems smarter to wait a bit. When Vega comes out, the prices should normalize, and maybe go down a bit because of market pressure.

All in all, for the people who have older cards and want to upgrade for a solid 1080p gaming, this seems like the best option with that kind of a price. We'll have to wait for GTX 1060, but I'm assuming it'll provide a similar performance for around $250, so I don't think it'll be able to beat this one; especially considering how Nvidia is rushing it now. I'm looking forward to some further tests using DX12 and Vulkan. That might show some extra future proofing :) I say this is good news though. We need a strong AMD in the market for better pressure on Nvidia for lower prices. It's still far from its Radeon days when they were kicking ass and taking names, but this is a step in the correct direction I'd say.
 
Oh you should definitely wait for 3rd party stuff, that's given. Reports show that ASUS Strix will be able to factory overclock it to around 1650 MHz boost clock, for example. Custom coolers will definitely be much quieter and would give more headway in overclocking. The reference design doesn't seem to be overly impressive in that regard. Apparently it only gives headway for 100 MHz in overclocking, in the best case scenario.
 
Got my GTX 1070 today: (MSI Gaming X)


Performance wise it's roughly the same as my old 980Ti. A tad better maybe. Of course driver updates will further improve the performance but it's never going to leave the 980Ti to dust. (minus maybe DX12/Vulkan titles.)

The real difference however is in the noise levels and temperatures. Even though my apartment is like a sauna right now, the fans don't spin faster than 1300RPM which makes it nearly silent. Can't hear it over the ambient noise in the room. And the peak temp I've recorded was 71C. And this was after overclocking. The 980Ti in similar conditions would be 10C hotter and loud as hell.

Just goes to show how much more efficient Pascal is compared to Maxwell.

Also, damn MSI cards are wide:


The power cables are rubbing my R4's side panel. If you own a narrow case I recommend looking for something like EVGA or Gigabyte cards..
 
I thing it's not tested out yet.

However, something else to notice: The upcoming Radeon RX 480 Nitro 8GB will feature an LED-illuminated SAPPHIRE logo,
(according to VideoCardz's source) stating that the colors will change depending on the fan speed,
GPU temperatures, or a custom profile that the user can set.

Nice feature!
 
Here is the regular RX 480 from inside:
http://ocaholic.ch/modules/news/article.php?storyid=14964

Th main PCB is quite small.

--------

For those who haven't seen the AMD Sapphire main page:
http://www.sapphiretech.com/catapage_pd.asp?cataid=305&lang=eng
http://www.sapphiretech.com/productdetial.asp?pid=4647A08C-25B5-4E68-B291-DEF9837B36A6&lang=eng

Pictures from XFX ans Power Color
http://www.overclock.net/t/1603257/jd-xfx-rx480-8gb-pictured-with-official-specifications-update

Asus and MSI tease custom Radeon RX 480 cards (WoW, STRIX looks awesome if that's a true picture!)
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/asus-and-msi-tease-custom-radeon-rx-480-cards.html







 
Last edited:
Top Bottom