usually the leader of an "evil" party mantains the command thansk to fear and not ( or at least not solely) on respect as it may happen,let's say in a democracy
this is the first and most obvious reason i could provide you as an answer to the question ( why the eveil guy's boss must be the most intimidating of the bounch)
Even if this is so, you aren't explaining why that fear is best gained by an armor's appearance. I even argue that the closer people are to him, the less he needs to rely on appearance, and more on action. Meaning that if he wants to hold his band of Riders by terrorizing them (again, arguable), that still isn't an argument in favor of the bulky armor from before.
regarding the other paragraph you are lying. it's plain and simple. there is NO way in hell, that you would find on a primordial instictively level more thrathening for your life Oro than Oni if you had to face one of the two in real life at first look. you are able to add all your post tought reasoning only becouse that could never happen and if really putted against them the worst case scenario is a game over,not your life ending. and since we have to presume to feel the same level of life ending threat the in game characters are feeling twards Eredin like the common paesant in the witcher world and not ours as essentially,the,untachable all powerfoul, omnipotent beings able to change the very fabric of reality of eredin world ( and even character as we are witnessing) with a simple mouse click we basically are when dealing with games your points are void of any true meaning. you don't feel trathned on and a sustantial primordial level becuose..well you basically aren't. it's only a videogame.
but if it was real life like i'm pretending for the sake of letting you know that again, my point IS true,becouse that's how the human and generally the mammal mind works trust me you would NOT choose oni over Oro, no matter how non threathened you might find hime as a gamer.
Aaaand we hit that non-productivity mark, where I'm being slandered as a liar. tsuchinokoultimate, if you're willing to use such disrespectful rhetoric, the least you can do is get your facts straight - at no point did I project myself into a peasant and say as that role which of those two characters I rather fight. You're making something up. Let's review this. You say-
regarding the other paragraph
And that other paragraph is-
I had half a mind to argue this, because I don't appreciate presumptions on my account, let alone when they're delivered with a haughty line such as "you would no doubt 100% choose what I'm trying to prove is right". But then I realized that it's not essential to our debate anyway. First, because Eredin is otherworldly as is. Second, even if one of his captains has a more intimidating appearance, I haven't read any convincing argument here that explains why the King has to look significantly more intimidating than his other generals (and I personally find him the most intimidating in appearance out of the Red Riders).
I'm pointedly staying
away from the Oro-Oni discussion in this paragraph of mine, so at what point am I lying that I, as a peasant, would choose to fight the Oro instead of Oni? At no stage did I say that.
There was one paragraph where I wrote my impression about Oni, but it was in an older post, so I stands to reason that you weren't referencing it. Still, I'll bring it up again-
I found that Oni chap very boring, going by appearances alone. Overly bulky, evil laughter, excessive power, shiny silvery-fiery hair, weird floating balls around him... it just screams too much, for me. I don't find that design tasteful, or badass, just gratuitously "intimidating" - or trying to be. And the end result is something I find uninspiring.
In this paragraph of mine, I write that
I find him boring. I, Eli, 21st century, sitting on my couch. Not I as Eli in a medieval'esque fantasy world facing him for a life or death battle. Heck, I even put in Bold the words "for me". You dub me a liar? What is this other than utterly twisting what I'm saying?
But here's the thing.
You're creating a false analogy here with Ono-Oni and OldEredin-NewEredin. Ono is an unassuming old man. So when compared to Oni, then obviously the latter stands out much more (which I still find dull, as an audience). They're different at the core, opposing sides on the spectrum. That's not our case here for the discussion about the King. If we're comparing Old Eredin and New Eredin, I believe that a peasant will piss his pants from either version. What, will the old design make him piss his pants
more? New Eredin = piss until knee, Old Eredin = piss until shin?
My point by ridiculing this is that Eredin is
still intimidating, and that
even if Old Eredin is supposedly "more intimidating" to a peasant, the difference is negligible. And when the difference is negligible, there are many other considerations that might weigh heavier.
Here's another thing. Let's say for the sake of the discussion that as a peasant, if I'm forced to face someone to fight, I'll prefer New Eredin over Old Eredin (which isn't to say I don't find New Eredin frightening).
So what?
When was it established that Eredin needs to max out the "fear points" in his appearance, to the exclusion of any other consideration? I began my posts to you by saying that I don't agree with the hidden assumption fueling this debate about his armor that he has to look as badass as possible, no matter what, and I'm ending my participation for the night by repeating that line of mine, because it wasn't addressed.