I'd definitely agree with most of this. There are times when more information would be extremely useful, and the modding tools is one of those times. The only problem I see is that planned actions don't always work out the way the company wants, and there have been far too many times in the past when it's come back to bite them. But I do think that on such matters saying SOMETHING and working a little harder to make sure it's not misunderstood, and giving an update if plans change, would be better than silence, even though, as I said earlier, I think I can understand why they choose silence.@ReptilePZ I'd just like to say that I'm grateful you're engaging with us on the matter. It's positive to see such discussions take place.
We have a fine company who clearly pours a lot of effort into their work. We have a dedicated community who not only worship the ground CDPR walks on (most of the time), but also thoroughly enjoy their titles. There's a lot that can be learned on both fronts and I would definitely like to see some sort of representation from CDPR dedicated to community relations.
While I agree that there's certainly not much to reveal, announce and take on-board, there are instances where someone taking charge of said position would be appreciated. The modding tools situation for example. A simple response detailing exactly what plans where (whether it was to wait and see how much demand there is, if it's delayed, or never coming) would have countered the mass of confusion. It's literally the simplest of things.
Well, on the first question, I don't know, that's something only CDPR know. If I had to guess, I'd say there's no community manager because it's August and everyone's on vacation, so it's probably just bad timing in that regard. Plus not a lot of announcements either. PAX Prime is right around the corner, though, and that's where they'd need a NA community manager, so we might hear something new for that.How we can talk about building community while CDPR don't have Community manager? What is happening right now it's destroying of the community... Lack of communication, closed most active threads and etc.
I'm not exactly sure what this is referring to (and why you think you speak for "old users"; I'm an "old user" and I don't share your view). This, like the post above, seems like you being unsure about some moderator decisions rather than CDPR doing something wrong. Feel free to PM us if that is the case.A lot of the "old users" are no more active just becasue the fear of misunderstanding interpretaions have been imposed and they don't know how to write or why to do it, now.
I know guilts exist but discretion and diplomacy would be very usefull. YHou, Rep, and the majority of you have made a great job. That doesn't mean that the biggest mistakes have coming from the community users only. Users errors are punished. Sadly a rule with one direction to be apllied.
Edit, last case (sadly not the lastest) : Aen Shiede and his farewell post.
No need to thank moderators for this, we're community members just like you guys, we just get to be Internet janitors, too (yay).@ReptilePZ I'd just like to say that I'm grateful you're engaging with us on the matter. It's positive to see such discussions take place.
We have a fine company who clearly pours a lot of effort into their work. We have a dedicated community who not only worship the ground CDPR walks on (most of the time), but also thoroughly enjoy their titles. There's a lot that can be learned on both fronts and I would definitely like to see some sort of representation from CDPR dedicated to community relations.
While I agree that there's certainly not much to reveal, announce and take on-board, there are instances where someone taking charge of said position would be appreciated. The modding tools situation for example. A simple response detailing exactly what plans where (whether it was to wait and see how much demand there is, if it's delayed, or never coming) would have countered the mass of confusion. It's literally the simplest of things.
I've no problem with your opinions.It would be very nice to put a name to t"having been a community member for X years" because if I were mentioned I kindly take you out from your mistake ot this kind of interpretation you get in a possible case you were refrring to me. I have no receipt any PM from you so I'm inclining you have no problem with me or my opinions.
Well, on the first question, I don't know, that's something only CDPR know. If I had to guess, I'd say there's no community manager because it's August and everyone's on vacation, so it's probably just bad timing in that regard. Plus not a lot of announcements either. PAX Prime is right around the corner, though, and that's where they'd need a NA community manager, so we might hear something new for that.
As for closed threads, that has absolutely nothing to do with CDPR or their PR. Us moderators - not RED staff - are responsible for the decisions to close threads. And those decisions are based on the forum rules and regulations. If that's something you'd wish to discuss, you need to contact us via PM. Via PM is a dead way. I've used it an no answer. Thank you Rep, for your worry, but as any user is resposable of the opinion of other users, a mod cannot be responsable for another one. But at least, you talk,Here you never disappointing me)
Vacation is a valid excuse.
I'm not exactly sure what this is referring to (and why you think you speak for "old users"; I'm an "old user" and I don't share your view). This, like the post above, seems like you being unsure about some moderator decisions rather than CDPR doing something wrong. Feel free to PM us if that is the case.
12 users in this thread, 7 of them more than one year old, and alost thiese 12 in a general way of coincidenceopf POV about Community (users, moderators, CDPR PR responables). No, obviously, I'm not talking fgor other people. Even the OP is not mine. So, it would be very unfair for the 11 users just pointing at me a their voice. A new example of biased interpretation for keeping the main attention far away of the topic. Weird.
As for Aen Seidhe, users leave all the time, I don't see how some deciding to post about it is an idication of anything other than, well, a user wanting to post about it.
His post and all the post further in reply to his thoughts. No need to OOC his depart and his reasons.
No need to thank moderators for this, we're community members just like you guys, we just get to be Internet janitors, too (yay).
On MODkit, far as I'm aware, Marcin said on twitter that there are no plans for other modding tools, so I'm not sure what else beyond that is expected in terms of clarifying things... You see, another time twiter... Official Forum is made of lower quality of users, perhaps?.
Nice to know. I've been scared for a moment.I've no problem with your opinions.
Can't comment on this, I haven't received any PMs from you recentlyVia PM is a dead way. I've used it an no answer. Thank you Rep, for your worry, but as any user is resposable of the opinion of other users, a mod cannot be responsable for another one. But at least, you talk, Here you never disappointing me)
I disagree with you here. What I see in this thread is people having different complaints, often contradicting each other. The general vibe I am getting, though, is "CDPR are not giving any indication of listening to my feedback. I (my usergroup) deserve more". I don't agree that the company should cater to this way of thinking. Feedback should not be measured by who is giving it, but how good it is. And, while there are certainly issues, I don't think they're being tackled from the right angle.12 users in this thread, 7 of them more than one year old, and alost thiese 12 in a general way of coincidenceopf POV about Community (users, moderators, CDPR PR responables). No, obviously, I'm not talking fgor other people. Even the OP is not mine. So, it would be very unfair for the 11 users just pointing at me a their voice. A new example of biased interpretation for keeping the main attention far away of the topic. Weird.
No, just one of many places where information is posted. Sometimes the forum gets some information that is then quoted in other media, other times, it's the other way around. Way it's always been.You see, another time twiter... Official Forum is made of lower quality of users, perhaps?.
This is the first time I heard about it too. Good to know though an I agree that this doesn't seem good, when there is so little or no staff dedicated to it. Surprised, that Chri only worked there for such a short time.As for communication on CDPR's side - first of all, Marcin is not a community manager, he's a community lead and website coordinator, i.e. he manages the managers and the sites. Him talking to us is a result of his own will to do so, not his responsibility. As for our actual community manager, well, that was Chris Priestly, who no longer works with CDPR, so we don't actually have one atm (I imagine CDPR are in the process of hiring one, August probabaly not being a good month for doing so), so I don't understand how people can complain about community managers when they clearly have no idea what the situation there is.
Xbox One, the all-in-one games and entertainment system from Microsoft
Xbox One, the all-in-one games and entertainment system from Microsoft
Xbox One, the all-in-one games and entertainment system from Microsoft
Xbox One, the all-in-one games and entertainment system from Microsoft
I think the problem was, that many of these things were regional or retailer differences, which you would notice there, but were not officially announced or praised by CD Projekt. Though I disagree with giving people different things for their money in different versions by retailer or platform, at least it was not in the base game and I don't know the reality of such deals and if they are not avoidable. Exclusive things seem to be inherintly anticonsumer and I support TBs stand (couldn't find the exact quote I wanted, but here is a table for Arkham Knight) on this, even if he just talks about in game things. It would have helped though, if they could have reassured people, that the cards were available at some point in the merchandise shop. But best not do it at all, if you can help it.We are also providing special pre-order items for certain retailers around the world, including Witcher comic books, posters, steel books or medallions. Funnily enough, we did not notice any heated comments on the pre-order specials.
I guess this stance was still expected by most. Instead, it feels like they changed their mind, but would not tell us why.We want to give players the power to tell the same kind of non-linear, branching stories that made The Witcher games so popular.
i get what you mean sir, but the ceo still stated we were getting an EDITOR with full features, and this was confirmed by @Benzenzimmern multiple times.MODkit, for example. The problem isn't that a promise was broken, because we were never promised this (all we have on modding tools was an interview with Iwin, where he said what he was hoping users would do with the kit - and this is where most people started speculating it would be a lot like the REDkit, speculating being the keyword - and that they're working on it, with the intention to release it early on - no actual details were ever given or promised). The issue is that it's not as powerful as the previous editors and no reason has been given as to why this decision was made. But saying CDPR broke a promise has a much better ring to it, doesn't it? Well, that, unfortunately (other than being factually incorrect), takes the focus away from the actual issue and infuses the topic with a lot of unnecessary emotional responses. And that's part of the reason why we get silence.
All that post says is that there will be modding tools, still no actual details.The name matters little, WIP names are not uncommon in the industry.i get what you mean sir, but the ceo still stated we were getting an EDITOR with full features, and this was confirmed by @Benzenzimmern multiple times.
the Modkit is not an editor, it is a sort of unpacker/recompiler for the game files, which modders tried to exploit more or less, but it's so bare bones, that modders had to make it a GUI, which should've been there in the first place.
while i don't think CDPR broke their promise, i'm not really sure what to think, especially after marcin momot's latest reply. this is a perfect example of bad communication. for the time being, we have no choice but to hope that they're still working on it.
some of the sources:
And that's the main point of this thread, so let's focus on constructive ways to change that.@Scholdarr.452 I agree with your sentiment that just because they did so in the past doesn't mean that can't or shouldn't change.
And how exactly being "mainstream" translates into having poor communication? If anything, bigger studios should have more resources for that in comparison with smaller ones. What crowdfunding studios do is setting a good example, which "mainstream" should pay attention to. And as was pointed out, CDPR never were very good with it even when they were smaller. So it's not an issue of size and improving it now would be very useful.The other thing is that I don't think the expectation of really open communications is realistic, given the situation of the company. Unlike KS projects, smaller studios etc., CDPR is a massive studio in terms of popularity comparatively speaking, its products are mainstream. Meaning, unlike those examples you gave, they need to engage with a much wider range of audiences.
No, you are getting a wrong message. The general vibe of the thread is "CDPR is not communicating enough with the community".I disagree with you here. What I see in this thread is people having different complaints, often contradicting each other. The general vibe I am getting, though, is "CDPR are not giving any indication of listening to my feedback. I (my usergroup) deserve more".
Moderator: Claims that anyone at CDPR told "constant lies" are false and so offensive that any member who makes them is only perpetuating the alienation between those who wish to use the forum constructively and CDPR.CDPR has simply dumbed down to the mainstream market they are trying to reach. That started with the constant lies during the development to attract the masses with unreal graphics and overpromised game systems and peaked with the actual game which in the end ended up as a riskfree calcul where the parts critical to the series are underdeveloped for the sake of the open world gimmick and other mass market goodness (in the that didn't work out that great since in comparsion to Europe the game barely made a dent in 'Merica where they tried so hard to establish themselves).
As such, it shouldn't be surprising that their attitude changed too and that the older fans may feel... alienated.
And it's not like this board is the only place that has noticed it. /v/, GAF, leddit... all of those places are fed up with CDPR's holier than thou attitude they keep pushing out while in reality they are busy underdelivering and breaking every other promise they give out. Iwinski's "nice guy who looks just like your neighbour after a hard week at work" attitude can only cover up for so many (un)intentional fuck ups. Or maybe he just doesn't have that much influence on the actual studio anymore.
i agree. i've taken the time to re-read some replies posted here, and @Scholdarr.452 (http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/56672-Communication-between-the-Witcher-community-and-CDPR?p=1896635&viewfull=1#post1896635), seems to share a similar opinion with what i posted before (http://forums.cdprojektred.com/threads/56672-Communication-between-the-Witcher-community-and-CDPR?p=1897054&viewfull=1#post1897054).No, you are getting a wrong message. The general vibe of the thread is "CDPR is not communicating enough with the community".
Is CD Projekt RED's lack of communication really the source of the decline in the community though?No, you are getting a wrong message. The general vibe of the thread is "CDPR is not communicating enough with the community".