Witcher 3 wasn't?This is single player game, what do they expect ?
Clickbait for kindergartens.
Witcher 3 wasn't?This is single player game, what do they expect ?
Clickbait for kindergartens.
Going back to original premise, which is people complaining about this triple A title, and in this instance dodge re-map. Let's roll back to Witcher 3, which was like the best game ever, and it's clunky dodge mechanics on keyboard and mouse, could you remap that? Don't know myself, but you can read reddit post about CDPR trolling gamers.
To quote Jackie, CDPR has made the big leagues, when people start nitpicking things like this as to why they don't like a game. An absurd amount of the complaints I have seen on the C77, also appear in Witcher 3. No rubric exist for reviewing games, and in fact is probably more subjective of a pseudo science than being a food critic. Except, now that I think about it, food critics normally have some culinary credentials, so never mind...
nice responseCyberpunk is too complex. People switch to chess to chill out.
At this point i'm not sure if you aren't just trolling. Just in case, at least make sure that CDPR pays you.
Actually my intent was to make a point, but if data would help support.
Metacritic PC Witcher 3: 93, 9.4
Metacritic PC Cyberpunk 77: 86, 7.2
What I struggle with is that a lot of the complaints for C77, were also in Witcher 3. There are areas where C77 excels above Witcher 3 and other areas where Witcher 3 excels above C77. I actually think people that complain about it being incomprehensible that you can't map all the commands in the game to be trolling personally.
LOL, I guess I am on the CDPR volunteer staff. Either that or just enjoy arguing with people. Not sure yet...
everyone comparing to witcher 3, did any of you even play the witcher 3 at launch? it was terribly buggy too, mostly with physics and AI which is just conveniently where most of the glaring bugs are in CP2077. the game was so bugged and inbalanced that CDPR released a patch that made all my gear require 4 levels higher effectively soft locking my progression after i put in 40+ hours. I didn't play it again and beat it until after blood and wine released over 2 years later. at least CP2077, I was able to make it through the entire game and finish every side quest (even though I got 2 gigs after I had already completed them, stupid bugged Regina) within 2 weeks of launch.
Actually my intent was to make a point, but if data would help support.
Metacritic PC Witcher 3: 93, 9.4
Metacritic PC Cyberpunk 77: 86, 7.2
What I struggle with is that a lot of the complaints for C77, were also in Witcher 3. There are areas where C77 excels above Witcher 3 and other areas where Witcher 3 excels above C77. I actually think people that complain about it being incomprehensible that you can't map all the commands in the game to be trolling personally.
LOL, I guess I am on the CDPR volunteer staff. Either that or just enjoy arguing with people. Not sure yet...
Cyberpunk development costs, meaning not considering marketing, were 3 times more than Witcher 3The Witcher 3 had only 93 thousand players and became a legend.
Cyberpunk had 1 million players and was the biggest disappointment I have made into video games.
This is what happens when you spend more energy on marketing than on development.
I mean when people start throwing out the shill word it means they have nothing important to say, and that it's best to just move on and enjoy whatever it is you find entertaining. No shame in that.
They didn't learned
Still better to resort to metacritic, where people had to pop out 10/10 reviews just not to let the game collapse under the negative reviews. ( not even counting the fake journalist reviews ) Open the reviews of CP2077 for pc and see what I mean.
And what is the result?Cyberpunk development costs, meaning not considering marketing, were 3 times more than Witcher 3
Still better to resort to metacritic, where people had to pop out 10/10 reviews just not to let the game collapse under the negative reviews. ( not even counting the fake journalist reviews ) Open the reviews of CP2077 for pc and see what I mean.
So wait... a platform that is known for review bombing, in this instance has legitimate bad reviews, instead we have an army of fanboys that are review praising. We're supposed to look through 26596 reviews, for those phony "good" reviews, when in fact that's just 2.6% of day 1 steam players, which will result in even smaller percentage if you include Steam players after day 1 and GOG players.
While this tiny sampling of players led to scores lower than witcher 3, even though they share so many of the systems, and high number of bugs, I can't help but feel that the hype surrounding C77 led to more review bombs then phony praise.
I mean the inverse of this is true as well - see TLOU2.