A good watch straight on the subject:
I love the opening parody in the first review vid were CDPR join the 'bad kids' EA, Activision, and Bethesda. The rest of the review was pretty spot on too.
A good watch straight on the subject:
If anything, you are the one exposing themselves. To praise the game as much as you do considering in what state it released, is straight up delusional.And you've just exposed yourself a someone who either hasn't played the full game, or only done one playthrough. This false notion that the story is linear, or that there are no choices and consequences is honestly laughable given the amount of choices and consequences in this game, especially for minor quests. Just stop perpetuating this fiction, the devs being the ones who programmed all of it know it's not true - and the players who have done multiple playthroughs and experienced a multitude of differences know as well. It just makes you come across as disingenuous.
How's about you guys optimize the game some more so it will actually run decently for the recommended specs provided on pc?
This false notion that the story is linear, or that there are no choices and consequences is honestly laughable
If anything, you are the one exposing themselves. To praise the game as much as you do considering in what state it released, is straight up delusional.
Also, saying something like "I didn't notice any bugs in my game" doesn't mean much. How do we know that you didn't overlook bugs? bugs that you might have perceived as normal occurrence in this game?
If you enjoy the game for what it is, then that's fine. But don't act like as if this game is a f'ing masterpiece, because it really is not.
Cohh Reacts To And Talks About The Cyberpunk 2077 - Our Commitment To Qu...via @YouTube
Somebody analysed this and found that over 90% of the dialogue choices effectively do nothing. The lead you back to the same outcome.
Yeah well, your opinion just shows how easy it is to satisfy your needs. Clearly all you care about is just story and nothing else. That's some of the things this game was actually good at. Writing, presentation, world design and so on. Those things were pretty well done. More than acceptable at least.that is your "subjective opinion" not a fact. The same as the "lost trust" "missing features " and "false advertising " rants.
A link to my opinion on the above subjext matter
[SPOILERS]How would you describe Cyberpunk 2077 after 100+h?
maybe, but thats part of the pen&paper... (same goes for shadowrun) it dosnt have anything to do if your char is an angle or an ass its just how far you are a machine or still human 1610215668 Why would you concern yourself with what "other" people do? And please, drop the "mods are like...forums.cdprojektred.com
[...]
Allow me to present you a different angle, "What do you think the game promised is? How does it compare to what other people think?"
I think its fine asking for the game to actually fucking play right on last generation consoles, better AI for enemies, better AI for NPCs, driving improvements, and the cops to not be so terrible.
However, do I think they will add another hour to the Life Paths and Jackie montage? No. Nor do I think they will change any of the dialogue or endings or romances.
Yeah well, your opinion just shows how easy it is to satisfy your needs. Clearly all you care about is just story and nothing else. That's the only thing this game was actually good at. Gameplay wise it's not a good game, and that's a fact. Gunplay in this game is janky and doesn't feel satisfying at all. If you ever played some of the better FPS games out there, you would know. Destiny, Doom, Counter-Strike, Overwatch, etc.
"This is not an FPS game", you are kidding right? you know what FPS stands for, right? it stands for FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. FPS doesn't stand for COMPETITIVE SHOOTER, which I believe is what you seem to understand from it.You are correct.
And that is why you comment is a subjective opinion . This is not a FPS game, I could care less about "gunplay , combat or balance" This is not any of the game you mentioned above no is a clone of GTA , The Division. I personaly hope they don't waste dev time on any of those aspects.
The minute they over promise content and how they mislead people.
A link to my opinion on the above subject matter
[SPOILERS]How would you describe Cyberpunk 2077 after 100+h?
maybe, but thats part of the pen&paper... (same goes for shadowrun) it dosnt have anything to do if your char is an angle or an ass its just how far you are a machine or still human 1610215668 Why would you concern yourself with what "other" people do? And please, drop the "mods are like...forums.cdprojektred.com
"This is not an FPS game", you are kidding right? you know what FPS stands for, right? it stands for FIRST PERSON SHOOTER. FPS doesn't stand for COMPETITIVE SHOOTER, which I believe is what you seem to understand from it.
You play the game in FIRST PERSON and you SHOOT things.This game is if first person perspective . It odes not me it is a first person shooter.
The core aspect of this game is Story and story content .
NOT gunplay / combat / looting and shooting stuff. again this is NOT GTA THE DIVISON DESTINY ETC
hence this is not classified as a FPS
What?
I dont really care what your opinion is on this matter.
I argue facts. Not personal opinions.
You play the game in FIRST PERSON and you SHOOT things.
And you just confirmed that all you care about really is just story. Which.. is fine. If that's all you wanted from this game, whatever. But that's not how the game was marketed at. It wasn't marketed as a visual novel, or a movie that you would just watch. There is gameplay, it's a game after all. Gameplay shouldn't be just means to play through the story, but it should also be fun to engage with it.
This game is if first person perspective . It odes not me it is a first person shooter.
The core aspect of this game is Story and story content .
NOT gunplay / combat / looting and shooting stuff. again this is NOT GTA THE DIVISON DESTINY ETC
hence this is not classified as a FPS