Here’s an interesting review.
No reasonable person takes them seriously. chuckle. They excel on always moving the goal post to unreachable heights for any CRPG. Then sit around and mope about it endlessly on how it is a 'failure'. Rinse and repeat. Short of a carbon copy of Fallout 1 or Planscape they will never like a CRPG to any significant degree.
Mighty Bjorn review out.
"The first few hours of the game is very refined, and very good, and I enjoyed it A LOT. However; It's when the game really opens up to you is where I start getting disappointed with the game and honestly.. in my opinion the game got pretty boring pretty quick."
Yeah... feels bad, man.
Watched about a half of it, probably not going to bother with the rest.Noah Caldwell-Gervais' reviews are all a bit like radio reviews, where what he says is more important than what you can see, but if you treat it like a podcast, it's greatly written and insightful.
Watched about a half of it, probably not going to bother with the rest.
So much of his expectations regarding the setting, worldbuilding and general feel of the game were based on Neuromancer without one mention of Mike Pondsmith and his universe. Not one.
Oh, and RDR2, of course, a game that shares so many similarities with CP2077, like:
1) being set in open world
...and... that's basically it.
There's also common problem with left-leaning reviewers and what to them constitutes as "anti-capitalist enough", which is "almost nothing".
Same, he's made some good videos in the past and he's obviously interested in the genre. Which makes this false premise even more baffling.Very surprising as I used to somewhat like his previous essays on The Elder Scrolls (someone said bugs and shallow side content), Knights of The Old Republic 2 (talk about broken and unfinished) and Mass Effect (do you like your RPG? here have some third person shooter).