Oh that's good to know. Death March isn't permadeath rigth?
Nope..they confirmed it on the IGN livestream. Also there is no unique gear for Death March.
I'm not sure if they will patch in an insane difficulty (that has permadeath) , but we shall see.
Yeap, and AC:U got 9/10... i guess that's polish sens of consistent standards...
@maork22 Do you happen to have a link to a video of the stream? ty
I noticed them too, in fact I noticed a quite a few large object that have a terrible pop in. It is so strange, the trees for example have an excellent pop in range mostly where say in Skyrim they would appear right in front of you sometimes, but the huge arse sails just spawn out of nowhere in TW3, also some big parts of buildings (when approaching the harpy nest tower in IGN stream).
It seems slightly better on PC, but for a big city Novigrad still feels kind of sparsely populated. This is literally the only graphical issue that I've found worth mentioning so far, since crowds are such an important part of the feel of a city in a video game. They don't even have to be Assassin's Creed style giant masses of people, just maybe 20-40 people on screen at any given time. I hope that there's still such people density in some parts of the city.
This made me lol. What I found even more amusing, is the fact you're actually trying to reason with these people ;p
Someone needs to tell to whoever wrote that Polygon review that there is a difference between a game being misogynistic and a game portraying a misogynistic world. According to that review's logic, Schindler's List, Green Mile, Selma, 12 Years a Slave etc. are all disappointments because they are all racist.
that Polygon review certainly did not disappoint
I see that our @misho8723 already got banned over it on sonygaf:rly?:
I see that our @misho8723 already got banned over it on sonygaf:rly?:
From Polygon.
I agree with this, it's a dumb choice.
Well, this is bad if true.
How? On the contrary to the claim, it is not a simplification at all, but added complexity. In TW2 dodging did absolutely nothing to your stamina and you still cast Signs out of the same pool you parried from, and I see no reason why that should have been changed.
That reviewer noobed out. That part really wasn't simplified. It grew in complexity and was re-balanced. I think he is comparing Witcher the Souls. :hai:
Going dark, btw. Seeing way too many spoilers everywhere, even before clicking on youtube videos.
Going dark, btw. Seeing way too many spoilers everywhere, even before clicking on youtube videos.
Actually that was addressed in the review, let us not forget that reviews and games are made by people and people have their own bias.
What I got from the review was, it is a misogynist world with some good critiques in lore but not enough to balance it. The example of the male character criticizing one female character armor being too open in The WItcher game, is as silly as Iron Bull(naked) saying to Cassandra(fully dressed) that she has good taste in armor, and not the bikini nonsense.
It did the same a lot of the time in TW2, it just got it wrong occasionally.
Because it seems that, without any vigor decreasement, you can spam dodge and roll, and this is an exploit to win all the fight (as I've read in other review). And that you don't need the alchemy.
There was never any need for potions or oils on the default difficulty in a Witcher game.
And I never said that in TW2 it was good. It was just acceptable because in a linear HUB patter RPG, the enemy encounters are not so frequently.
But I still prefer how it was managed in The Witcher 1.
---------- Updated at 12:58 AM ----------
In first one, yes.