Which I find a bit weird, because they have different takes. If they were doing the same thing then it's easier to expect the debate of "which one does it better" to become toxic, because the competition is very clearly head on. Right now they're both under the "Medievalesque fantasy RPG" category, but they both take it to very different directions, both in mechanics as well as story. BioWare opt for a party-based play with a more classic RPG course of deciding battles not on reflex-skill but your stats and abilities, focus on inner-party interactions, and let you play the big hero. CDPR mechanics from TW2 to TW3 have more action elements in them and - as far as a CV of two games is telling - their stories are much lower in scale and place you in the shoes of a protagonist with considerably less authority.When DA2 bombed, fans constantly rubbed TW2 in their faces. The forums got toxic, the devs got defensive, the rest is history. This silly poll is likely their marketing team and nothing more. Broadly speaking, I think the topic goes deeper, with each company espousing opposite takes on fantasy narrative, and thus very different and combative fan bases.
It's not a zero sum game, but it a good competition for both parties involved. CDPR would not give two shits about imports if Bioware wasn't pushing them so hard, and Bioware would have continued making shitty games after DA2 if Witcher 2 hadn't come out and smashed their faces in.I feel that this competition is often regarded mistakenly as a zero-sum game. At least that's my impression when comments tend to become heated.
that's because on BSN Witcher pops out in about every other thread while DA discussion here is pretty much contained in this oneI don't know if they're "touchy". But some kind of awkwardness between the two communities is understandable (particularly when the release of two major games are close to one another) when these two companies are the main ones currently to deal in medieval fantasy RPG. Personally I think that this friendly competition, which is very welcome and I am happy exists, makes people take this as an almost personal issue. Not talking about our or their forums, just comments I read throughout the internet at large.
What's curious to me is the stark difference between how DA is covered here and how TW is discussed at the BSN. Here it's the most debated topic in the gaming sub-forum, and there TW3's thread thread keeps fading in and out of existence every few weeks. I don't have anything to conclude from this, just something that I noted.
Ok Origin, you go too far with your idiotic polls.
I respect it when Bioware-fans dont want to create shitstorm between Witcher and Dragon Age but why EA is now begging for blood from his nose? By provoking a shitsorm that does never lead to anywhere.
Witch vs Witcher
What about this rule then?Lol sorry boys, but always choose the poon. It's a rule.
Morrigan's my baby.