^^^ This I like. Have you seen Hardcore Henry? Check out Biting Elbows' videos as well.
- Status
[ICYMI] Building the future on pen and paper: CD Projekt Red on Cyberpunk 2077 and moving on from The Witcher | MCV/DEVELOP
“We’ve stuck to as much of the original Cyberpunk 2020 as we can" | MCV/DEVELOP
www.mcvuk.com
Some choice quotes:
This is a potentially interesting one for certain people:
Then there’s a bunch of stuff about Cyberpunk RED, but I haven’t really followed that one, so I don’t really know what’s relevant to quote.
[ICYMI] Building the future on pen and paper: CD Projekt Red on Cyberpunk 2077 and moving on from The Witcher | MCV/DEVELOP
“We’ve stuck to as much of the original Cyberpunk 2020 as we can" | MCV/DEVELOP
Some choice quotes:
This is a potentially interesting one for certain people:
Then there’s a bunch of stuff about Cyberpunk RED, but I haven’t really followed that one, so I don’t really know what’s relevant to quote.
Pretty words, but aside from the overall theme and world building (which I'm sure is very faithful to 2020, don't get me wrong), not sure how much they're actually reflected in-game.
To what extent that’s possible since there’s a 57-year timegap and - if my memory serves - some kind of alternate timeline thingamajick too.
Otherwise, yeah, not sure about anything but what I’ve seen thus far.
There's no alternate time line. Only one, shared by 2020, RED and Cp2077.
I remember wrong, then.
I could’ve sworn there was something said about such thing (can’t recall specifics) somewhere in the interview jungle since 2018.
Ah, ok. I’m probably remembering that bit, then.
Last edited:
[ICYMI] Building the future on pen and paper: CD Projekt Red on Cyberpunk 2077 and moving on from The Witcher | MCV/DEVELOP
“We’ve stuck to as much of the original Cyberpunk 2020 as we can" | MCV/DEVELOP
Irritating to say the least:
-We’ve stuck to as much of the original Cyberpunk 2020 as we can. (That means: fluff only, and only part of it)
-It was really important to us to remain faithful to the original.
-“Very often I think, not just in games, but in books and movies too, you see promises being made without actually showing anything behind it – and then you’re building hype essentially based on just your words.
Even if the product is very good, people might feel let down, and be like ‘oh, this isn’t what I thought it was going to be.’” (All so true...)
- But you can also play as a guy who claims he doesn’t even use cyberware, and is just this… vanilla human. (Sooooo Fake!)
-Although, with the wide array of cyberware available in the game to customise your character with, it’s hard for us to understand why players would want to turn it down in the first place. (Because normally getting cyber is supposed to have big negative consequences too?)
-You create your own character and you choose how you want them to play. I call it ‘open gameplay’, customising a character for the exact style of play that you want. (Well, at least know that's a confirmation of what "don’t have an established character" really means)
Besides, that part is still as vague as can be:
"This sense of freedom and player choice in character creation has created headlines in the run up to the game’s launch, as it was revealed that players will not select to play as a man or a woman, but start with a choice between two body types, one traditionally masculine and one traditionally feminine. A seemingly small point to some, but one that potentially allows for players to create gender nonconforming characters, a sensible choice for a game centered around body modification and player choice. "
Did he confirmed Mr Studd on Female body and Midnight lady on Male body or do that last part have no sense at all?
Looks like Mr. Wallace had a bit of fun while writing the article.
Really liked this ending quote from Borzymowski as well:
What we know :
You have the choice between two bodies. Next you customize it and you choose pronoum
Like "having a body with breast and using He"
I'm even more confused now.
They once said you could mix and match body parts, is that no longer the case? Or was it ever the case and they misspoke?
I think it was that you can make a man or woman body and simply choose which voice set you use (man/woman), and that voice set defines ”who” you are.
Don’t remember exactly, but I think I would remember if they said (or implied) you can play ”reanimator” or Dr. Frankenstein and make a tight chick body with mismatching and mix-gendered limbs and attach a bearded man-head to it. I would certainly take advantage of that option.
I can hardly wait for the memes to start popping out. Just imagine the ”sensitive” mocapped sex scenes where that sort of of swamp monster gently caresses its...catch. All credibility gone, but good laughs given.
Last edited:
you can use a male voice with female character or vice versa, i think they didn't go beyond that and assured that you can't change your ahh.. genitals
i bet its one of those shitty clickbait pcgamer or polygon articles thats misleading people
i bet its one of those shitty clickbait pcgamer or polygon articles thats misleading people
So far as I know, Snow is correct about prior statements, and I dont think it's changed. Here's the most thorough quote we have on it:
From E3 interview this year - https://gamasutra.com/view/news/344..._working_on_transgender_character_options.php
I wouldn't worry. Choose a body type, then mix and match as much as you please from that starting point. Voice picks how NPCs refer to you. Makes sense to me.
Last edited:
Hyped to soon live in an authoritarian, consumerist, and environmental dystopia... in the game, of course
- Status