I really love playing Skellige and thus i'm concerned about Eist.
He surely is the worst Skellige leader and it would be okay if gap between him and rest of leaders wasnt so huge.
His ability is resurrecting a Warrior. Once. That's bad even not knowing what 'Warrior' means. But when you look at top Warriors availible now there are like 2 viable options in my opinion: Dagur and (kinda) Lugos. Both require going deeper into wounding archetype... which actually does far more better with Harald or even Crach. So basically what's the point of Eist? Somebody might say "yea, there are greatswords and queensguard too". Sure, but you can just resurrect them with Freyas or Necromancy and not sacrificing the pick of a better leader.
Is he actually that bad or am I missing something?
He surely is the worst Skellige leader and it would be okay if gap between him and rest of leaders wasnt so huge.
His ability is resurrecting a Warrior. Once. That's bad even not knowing what 'Warrior' means. But when you look at top Warriors availible now there are like 2 viable options in my opinion: Dagur and (kinda) Lugos. Both require going deeper into wounding archetype... which actually does far more better with Harald or even Crach. So basically what's the point of Eist? Somebody might say "yea, there are greatswords and queensguard too". Sure, but you can just resurrect them with Freyas or Necromancy and not sacrificing the pick of a better leader.
Is he actually that bad or am I missing something?